The Applicability of Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022 Regarding the Statute of Limitations for Document Forgery in Relation to the New Criminal Code
Main Article Content
Abstract
Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022 altered the policy for calculating the statute of limitations for the crime of document forgery; however, the implementation of the new Criminal Code does not reflect this change. This study employs a normative approach, using a literature review to analyze the applicability of the Constitutional Court’s decision to the new Criminal Code, which does not incorporate this change. The findings of the study indicate that, based on the principle of lex posterior derogat legi priori, the current regulations still adhere to Constitutional Court Decision 118/2022, as the new Criminal Code will not take effect until 2026. Should a material review related to this article arise in the future, the Constitutional Court must apply the principle of similia similibus to ensure justice and prevent discrimination, thereby guaranteeing equal treatment for all individuals under the law
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Journals
Arisandy, Deny. “Efforts to Divert Children in Conflict with Narcotics Crime Laws Are Linked to the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA).” Ratio Legis Journal 3, no. 1 (2024): 511–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.511-520.
Cita, Ray, Arifai Arifai, and Kamaruddin Kamaruddin. “Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat.” Journal Publicuho 7, no. 1 (2024): 414–24. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i1.374.
Harefa, Safaruddin. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia Melaui Hukum Pidana Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam.” University of Bengkulu Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2019): 35–58. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.4.1.35-58.
Iskandar, Dedi, Zulbaidah Zulbaidah W.N, Angga Almanda, and Iswandi Abdinur. “Perkembangan Teori Dan Penerapan Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin 1, no. 3 (2024): 293–305. https://jurnal.fanshurinstitute.org/index.php/jimmi/article/view/147.
Kartika, Adhitya Widya. “The Existence of Decision Norms of the Constitutional Court as A Source of Legislative and Executive Laws.” E-Journal Lentera Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 307–18. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.10495.
Latifah, Marfuatul. “Penghapusan Tahapan Penyelidikan Dalam Ruu Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 4, no. 1 (2013): 105–23. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v4i1.198.
Mukhlis, Mukhlis, Eddy Purnama, and Zahratul Idami. “Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pencabutan Larangan Keterlibatan Mantan Narapidana Sebagai Pejabat Publik.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2019): 266–80. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i2.12443.
Ningrum, Dian Ayu Widya, Al Khanif Al Khanif, and Antikowati Antikowati. “Format Ideal Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Untuk Mengefektifkan Asas Erga Omnes.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 314–58. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1924.
Rosalina, Fina. “Daluwarsa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Sudut Pandang Teori Hukum: Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 8, no. 2 (2022): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.169.
Sihombing, Eka N.A.M., and Cynthia Hadita. “Bentuk Ideal Tindak Lanjut Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal JAPHTN-HAN 1, no. 1 (2022): 35–46. https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i1.4.
Sugiarto, Totok, Wawan Susilo, and Purwanto Purwanto. “Studi Komparatif Konsep Tindak Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 25, no. 2 (2022): 219–32. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2022.25.2.219-232.
Syafriyani, Nurul, Dwi Febri Susilawati, and Kevin Rivaldi. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mempertahankan Negara Hukum Dan Mengupayakan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Insan Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 2, no. 3 (2024): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.59581/jipsoshum-widyakarya.v2i3.3401.
Triningsih, Anna, and Oly Viana Agustine. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Memuat Keadilan Sosial Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2020): 834–60. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1648.
Books
Armia, Muhammad Siddiq. Penentuan Metode & Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum. Aceh: Lembaga Konsumen Ketenagalistrikan Indonesia, 2022.
Chazawi, Adami, and Ardi Ferdian. Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan: Tindak Pidana Menyerang Kepentingan Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Mengenai Kebenaran Isi Tulisan Dan Berita Yang Disampaikan. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.
Hikmawati, Fenti. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017.
Natsir, Jufri, Ruslan Renggong, and Baso Madiong. Pemalsuan Surat Tanah Rinci Dan Sanksi Tindak Pidana. Edited by Hariufddin Halim. Gowa: Pusaka Almaida, 2021.
Zulfa, Eva Achjani, Taliya Qory Ismail, Adnan Mughoffar, Puisi Wihdah, Almira Ahmad, Siti Maun Pasaribu, Aghaesa Rakandya, and Imam Khomaeni Hayatullah. Perkembangan Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana: Persandingan Buku I KUHP Dan Baru. 1st ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2023.