Freedom of Panorama Terkait Pelindungan Karya Cipta di Ruang Publik Berdasarkan Hukum Hak Cipta dan Hukum Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v2i1.133Kata Kunci:
Freedom of Panorama, Hak Cipta, Perlindungan HukumAbstrak
Hadirnya teknologi digital semakin memudahkan manusia dalam menciptakan konten kreatif secara tanpa batas, misalnya dalam mengabadikan karya-karya cipta yang berada di ruang publik dan kemudian dapat menggunakannya secara komersil ataupun nonkomersil ke dalam platform ataupun media online. Hal tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan yakni bagaimana apabila karya cipta di ruang publik yang diabadikan dan diunggah ke dalam media-media online tersebut dikategorikan sebagai pelanggaran hak cipta. Dimana di beberapa negara, mengambil potret suatu karya cipta di ruang publik hanya dapat dilakukan di bawah ketentuan Freedom of Panorama. Pada dasarnya undang-undang hak cipta (UUHC) belum mengatur mengenai Freedom of Panorama dan pelindungan karya cipta yang ada di ruang publik, serta upaya pencegahan pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah dan penyedia platform juga belum secara maksimal dalam memberikan pelindungan terhadap karya cipta yang ada di ruang publik atas konten yang diunggah.
Referensi
Jurnal
Asri, Dyah Permata Budi. “Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Produk Kreatif Usaha Kecil Menengah Di Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 27, no. 1 (2020): 130–50. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/download/13584/10277.
Atmadja, Hendra Tanu. “Urgensi Pelindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Era Perdagangan Bebas.” Jurnal Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 3 (2015): 192–201. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/1220/1113.
Delanova, Mariane. “Diplomasi Ekonomi Indonesia Dan Negara-Negara Berkembang Dalam G-33 Untuk Mempromosikan Proposal Special Products Dan Special Safeguard Mechanism.” Jurnal Dinamika Global 1, no. 1 (2016): 14–31. https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v1i01.12.
Haryono, and Agus Sutono. “Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Hak Cipta Tinjauan Secara Filosofis Dan Teoritis.” Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS 6, no. 2 (2017): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.26877/civis.v6i2.1904.
Julianti, Lis, and Rika Putri Subekti. “Standar Perlindungan Hukum Kegiatan Investasi Pada Bisnis Jasa Pariwisata Di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicaksana 12, no. 2 (2018): 156–66. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.12.2.723.156-166.
Kilanta, Devega R. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 3 (2017): 94–102. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/15604.
Newell, Bryce Clayton. “Freedom of Panorama: A Comparative Look at International Restrictions on Public Photography.” Creighton Law Review 44, no. 2 (2011): 405. https://dspace2.creighton.edu/xmlui/handle/10504/136481.
Nugroho, Sigit. “Pelindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Pembangunan Ekonomi Di Era Pasar Bebas Asean.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Supremasi Hukum 24, no. 2 (2015): 164–78. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/supremasihukum/article/view/1199.
Pricillia, Luh Mas Putri, and I Made Subawa. “Akibat Hukum Pengunggahan Karya Cipta Film Tanpa Izin Pencipta Di Media Sosial.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 11 (2018): 1–15. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/41736.
Rosnay, Mélanie Dulong De, and Pierre-Carl Langlais. “Public Artworks and the Freedom of Panorama Controversy: A Case of Wikimedia Influence.” Internet Policy Review 6, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.1.447.
Shtefan, Anna. “New Voices Freedom of Panorama: The Eu Experience.” European Journal of Legal Studies 11, no. 2 (2019): 13–27. https://ejls.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2019/05/2-EJLS-112-Shtefan.pdf.
Sudjana, Sudjana. “Pembatasan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual (Hak Cipta) Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal HAM 10, no. 1 (2019): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2019.10.69-83.
Syarifuddin, Amir. “Filsafat Positivisme Dan Aliran Hukum Positif.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2015): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v7i1.61.
Buku
Jened, Rahmi. Hukum Hak Cipta (Copyright’s Law). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Perry, Mark. Copyright and (Dis)Harmonisation: Can Developing Nations Prioritise Their Own Public Good in a Global Copyright Hegemony?: The Reconceptualisation of Copyright. Copyright, Property and the Social Contract. Australia, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95690-9_5.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Nomor 28, Pasal 40 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 4 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 5 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 8 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 9 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (1994)
New Zealand. Copyright, Chapter 94 (6) Act (1994).
———. Copyright Act, Chapter 73 (1994).
The United States of America. 17 U.S.C. 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general (2012).
———. 17 U.S.C. 106 - Exclusive rights in copyrighted works (2011).
———. 17 U.S.C. 120 Scope of exclusive rights in architectural works (2011).
Keane, Patrick John. “Pernyataan Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Auckland.” 2003.
Internet
Bureaux Internationaux Reunis pour la Protection de la Propriete Intellectuelle. “The Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.” In The Berne Convention, 1886.
Caselaw Access Project Harvard Law School. “United States District Court for the Southern District of New York PAGANO et Al. v. CHAS. BESELER CO. July 3, 1916,” 2020. https://cite.case.law/f/234/963/.
Cyber Harvard Edu. “Frank Gaylord V. United States United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit 595 F.3d 1364,” 2010. https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/IP/2010_Gaylord.pdf.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI. “Sejarah Perkembangan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual (KI),” 2019. https://dgip.go.id/tentang-djki/sejarah-djki#:~:text=Secara historis%2C peraturan perundang-undangan,UU Hak Cipta (1912).
Google. “Google Terms of Services,” 2007.
Justitia. “Rock & Roll Hall of Fame & Museum, Inc. v. Gentile Prod., 71 F. Supp. 2d 755 (N.D. Ohio 1999),” 1999. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/71/755/2515490/.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Sinta ID: 
