Reconstructing Legal Protection for Deepfake Victims in Indonesia

Authors

  • Fathah Oscar Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Femmy Silaswaty Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Hanuring Ayu Ardhani Putri Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.496

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Cyber Law, Deepfake Videos, Victim Protection

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deepfake video technology, presents significant challenges to the protection of privacy, digital identity, and legal certainty. These challenges are exacerbated by the absence of a comprehensive legal framework governing deepfakes under Indonesian law. This study aims to analyze the regulation of deepfake technology under the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and the Indonesian Criminal Code; evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal protection for deepfake victims; and formulate a cyber law–based legal protection model. This research employs a normative legal methodology using qualitative analysis through statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that the current legal framework remains fragmented and fails to provide a clear legal definition of deepfakes, standardized digital forensic procedures, an effective takedown-and-staydown mechanism, or an integrated system of victim protection. In response to these shortcomings, this study proposes a Legal Protection Model for Deepfake Video Victims Based on the Deepfake Life Cycle, integrating preventive, repressive, and restorative legal approaches. The proposed model is intended to strengthen legal certainty, safeguard digital identity, enhance the effectiveness of cyber law enforcement, and ensure comprehensive protection and recovery for victims of deepfake-related offenses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Alrashoud, Mubarak. “Deepfake Video Detection Methods, Approaches, and Challenges.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 125 (2025): 265–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.007.

Arvitto, Rafi Satrya. “Implikasi Hukum Deepfake: Telaah Terhadap UU ITE Dan UU PDP.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 4, no. 2 (2025): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v4i2.3937.

Diel, Alexander, Tania Lalgi, Isabel Carolin Schröter, Karl F. MacDorman, Martin Teufel, and Alexander Bäuerle. “Human Performance in Detecting Deepfakes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 56 Papers.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 16 (December 2024): 100538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100538.

Farid, Hany. “Creating, Using, Misusing, and Detecting Deep Fakes.” Journal of Online Trust and Safety 1, no. 4 (2022): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i4.56.

Haida, Rendi Syaputra Nur, and Eko Nuriyatman. “Urgensi Pengaturan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Deepfake Melalui Artficial Inteligence (AI) Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Respublica 24, no. 1 (2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v24i01.23327.

https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/senpishum/article/view/62862.

Kietzmann, Jan, Linda W. Lee, Ian P. McCarthy, and Tim C. Kietzmann. “Deepfakes: Trick or Treat?” Business Horizons 63, no. 2 (2020): 135–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.006.

Kusnadi, Sekaring Ayumeida, and Dina Wanda Setiawan Putri. “Perlindungan Hak Privasi Dalam Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Deepfake Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 14, no. 2 (2025): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v14i2.2135.

Lazard, Lisa, Rose Capdevila, Emma L. Turley, Kathryn Gilfoyle, and Nelli Stavropoulou. “Deepfake Technology and Gender-Based Violence: A Scoping Review.” Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2025, 15248380251384271. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251384271.

Marsilindo, Marsilindo, Rizky Pratama Putra Karo-Karo, and Bambang Widarto. “Penggunaan Alat Bukti Digital Dalam Pembuktiian Tindak Pidana Siber Di Pengadilan Indonesia.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 8 (2026): 1527–38. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i08.2213.

Meisyah, Meisyah. “Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Bagi Pemilik Wajah Yang Digunakan Online Sebagai Hasil Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence).” Edu Yustisia: Jurnal Edukasi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2025): 19–24.

Mirsky, Yisroel, and Wenke Lee. “The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Survey.” ACM Computing Surveys 54, no. 1 (2022): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3425780.

Noerman, Chiquita Thefirstly, and Aji Lukman Ibrahim. “Kriminalisasi Deepfake Di Indonesia Sebagai Bentuk Pelindungan Negara.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 603–21. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.8995.

Palindria, Arvi Erawan, Muhammad Sulthan Thufail, and Muhammad Rieval Febrian. “Ancaman Deepfake Buatan AI Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Keamanan Data Biometrik Di Indonesia.” Spektrum Hukum 21, no. 2 (2024): 110. https://doi.org/10.56444/sh.v21i2.5319.

Robert Chesney and Danielle K. Citron. “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Priv Es: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democr , Democracy, and National Security.” California Law Review 107 (2019): 1753–820.

Rohmawati, Indah, Amir Junaidi, and Ariy Khaerudin. “Urgensi Regulasi Penyalahgunaan Deepfake Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Korban Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online (KBGO).” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research 4, no. 6 (2024): 1779–94. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16559.

Prosidings

Karo, Rizky Karo, Zein Jiddan, and Hanan Atanto Buono. “Analisis Dalam Kasus Penyalahgunaan Deepfake Dari Segi Perlindungan Data Pribadi Dalam UU ITE Dan UU PDP Di Indonesia.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2026): 1–8.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Reconstructing Legal Protection for Deepfake Victims in Indonesia. (2026). JIHK, 8(1), 746-766. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.496

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>