Drawing the Line: Criminal Responsibility of In-House Legal Counsel

Authors

  • Febriyani Febriyani Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Boedi Prasetyo Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.402

Keywords:

In-House Legal Counsel, Legal Opinion, Corporate Criminal Liability, Deelneming

Abstract

The criminal prosecution of in-house legal counsel in corporate cases has generated significant debate concerning the boundaries of criminal liability within the legal profession in Indonesia, particularly where legal opinions serve as the basis for corporate policy decisions. This study examines the legal limits of criminal liability for in-house legal counsel, evaluates the legal character of legal opinions in relation to the concept of deelneming, and critically analyzes the judicial reasoning in Decision Number 534/Pid.B/2024/PN Jakarta Selatan. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this study finds that the criminal liability of in-house legal counsel is determined by causal contribution and substantive intent rather than by formal position alone. Legal opinions may give rise to criminal liability when they function as instruments of legitimacy for unlawful conduct. The study concludes that the decision adopts a functional approach to professional legal accountability and underscores the necessity of clear normative boundaries to prevent the excessive criminalization of in-house legal counsel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Ahmed, Amjed Mezher. “The Administrative Judge’s Authority to Control Administrative Abuse in Its Decisions.” International Journal of Criminal, Common and Statutory Law 4, no. 2 (2024): 204–13. https://doi.org/10.22271/27899497.2024.v4.i2c.107.

Art, Stanley Muljadi, and Gunardi Lie. “The Legal Liability of Directors in State-Owned Enterprises: An Analysis of Judicial Inconsistencies in the Application of the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review 20, no. 4 (2025): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1386.

Behuku, Jitro Gianfranco, Jevine Ilonesia Kusuma, Nabila Uswatun Chasanah, and Fajar Sugianto. “The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis.” Signn Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2025): 351–67. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464.

Faturachman, Fauzan Azima, Tomi J.E Hutasoit, and Asmak Ul Hosnah. “Pertanggungjawaban Dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Akademik: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis 4, no. 2 (2024): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v4i2.731.

Gracia, Gracia, Dylan Aldianza Ramadhan, and Juan Matheus. “Implementasi Konsep Euthanasia: Supremasi Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Progresivitas Hukum Di Indonesia.” Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 2, no. 1 (February 2022): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v2i1.53730.

Heffinur, Heffinur. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pemegang Saham Dan Direksi Terhadap Korporasi Yang Dipidanakan.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2014): 133–52. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2014.v8.i2.p133-152.

Herliana, Herliana. “Ensuring Certainty through Legal Reasoning: What Can Indonesia Learn from the United Kingdom and the Unites States?” Jurnal Jurisprudence 13, no. 2 (2023): 318–38. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i2.3057.

Nurdipa, Ilhan, and Anita Zulfiani. “Penerapan Doktrin Identifikasi Dalam Menentukan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Referendum: Jurnal Hukum Perdata Dan Pidana 2, no. 2 (2025): 104–118. https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v2i2.779.

Pardamean, Michael Christoper. “Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Tindak Pidana Korporasi.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 7365–72. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1630.

Permana, Yoga Matofani, and Anis Rifai. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Dan Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Legal Officer Dalam Perseroan Terbatas: Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor: 1370 K/PID/2025.” Riwayat: Educatioanl Journal of History and Humanities 8, no. 4 (2025): 8251–64. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.51034.

Raffles. “Tanggung Jawab Dan Perlindungan Hukum Direksi Dalam Pengurusan Perseroan Terbatas.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2020): 107–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.107-137.

Saba, Citra Sriwani, and Weny A. Dungga. “Kriminalisasi Terhadap Profesi Legal Perusahaan Yang Memberikan Nasihat Hukum.” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 6, no. 2 (2025): 328–36. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v6i2.933.

Saipudin, Lalu, Salim H S, Rodliyah Rodliyah, and Laely Wulandari. “The Concept of Corporate Criminal Liability in the Indonesian Criminal Law System.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 13, no. 2 (2025): 475–499. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v13i2.1817.

Samad, Rezki Purnama, Ardiansyah Ardiansyah, and Eva Albatun Nabilah. “A Critical Analysis of Corporate Criminal Liability InLaw Number 1 of 2023.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 2 (2025): 664–81. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.515.

Shardimgaliev, Marat. “Implicatures in Judicial Opinions.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 32 (2019): 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-09601-4.

Suhariyanto, Budi, and Cecep Mustafa. “Contradiction Over the Application of Liability in Corruption Court Decisions in Indonesia.” Indonesian Law Review 13, no. 1 (2023): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.3.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Febriyani Febriyani, Boedi Prasetyo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

How to Cite

Drawing the Line: Criminal Responsibility of In-House Legal Counsel. (2025). JIHK, 7(2), 1367-1380. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.402