Inconsistency in the Implementation of Corruption Criminalization Guidelines Based on PERMA No. 1 of 2020 in the Harvey Moeis Case Decision

Authors

  • Moses Cristofel Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Boedi Prasetyo Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.367

Keywords:

PERMA No. 1 of 2020, Proportionality, Justice, Corruption, Judicial Integrity

Abstract

This study analyzes the inconsistency in applying Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2020 on Sentencing Guidelines for Corruption Cases in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst concerning Harvey Moeis. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, using library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed through a descriptive qualitative framework. The findings reveal that the sentencing failed to align with the principles of proportionality and justice mandated by PERMA No. 1 of 2020. Weak judicial oversight, subjective interpretation by judges, and declining professional ethics have led to sentencing disparities that erode public trust in judicial integrity. Systemic reconstruction is therefore required through stronger compliance mechanisms, an enhanced role of the Judicial Commission, and moral-based judicial training to ensure the consistent realization of substantive justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Fahmiron. “Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Sebagai Wujud Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Jurnal Litigasi 17, no. 2 (2016): 3467–3516. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v17i2.158.

Fansuri, Rayhan Fiqi, and Juan Matheus. “Enforcement of Human Rights through Criminal Law Against Environmental Destruction Due to Batik Industry Activities.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 291–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v7i2.

Hambali, Azwad Rachmat, Rizki Ramadani, and Hardianto Djanggih. “Politik Hukum PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pemidanaan Pelaku Korupsi.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 5, no. 2 (2021): 200–223. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i2.511.

Hermawan, Risa Sylvya Noerteta, and Hendra Setyawan Theja. “Independensi Hakim Memutus Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Perma No. 1 Tahun 2020 Jo. Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009.” Al-Qanun 24, no. 1 (2021): 145–69. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.1.145-169.

Huda, Ni’matul. “Problematika Pengaturan Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pidana Oleh Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 27, no. 3 (2020): 437–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss3.art1.

Leksono, Sony Cipto, Vony Vertian Naholo, Fitri Rustianti, Benard Simamora, and Hadi Purnomo. “Politik Hukum Dan Korupsi: Satu Kajian Kritis Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora 3, no. 2 (2025): 1071–84. https://doi.org/10.70193/cendekia.v3i2.213.

Muammar, Helmi, Wawan Kuruniawan, Fuad Nur Fauzi, Y Farid Bambang T, and Aryo Caesar Tanihatu. “Analisa Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pedoman Pemidanaan Kaitanya Dengan Asas Kebebasan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum 3, no. 2 (2021): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i2.412.

Pudjiastuti, Diah. “Penerapan Prinsip Akuntabilitas Dalam Independsi Hakim Di Indonesia.” Res Nullius Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2023): 112–22. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v5i2.9430.

Rudiansyah, Muhammad Mas Davit Herman. “Pelanggaran Etika Dan Integritas Hakim: Tinjauan Terhadap Efektivitas Komisi Yudisial Dan Badan Pengawas Yudisial.” Abdurrauf Law and Sharia 1, no. 2 (2024): 139–63. https://doi.org/10.70742/arlash.v1i2.92.

Salman, Tiara, and Arrie Budhiartie. “Analisis Konsep Keadilan Dalam Pandangan Filsafat Hukum Aristoteles Dan Relevansinya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Nalar Keadilan 4, no. 2 (2024): 49–57.

Santoso, Boy, and Erny Herlin Setyorini. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Sebagai Pedoman Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 1 (2023): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v19i1.7602.

Setiawan, Deni, Awan Maulidin Juna, M. Surya Fadillah, Sabdia Oktarianda, Zulkarnaen, Agus Rizal, and Ibnu Satrio. “Prinsip Proporsionalitas Dalam Penerapan Hukuman Pidana Di Indonesia.” JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin 1, no. 3 (2024): 266–78. https://doi.org/10.71153/jimmi.v1i3.144.

Tambunan, Edo Maranata, Rya Elita Br Sembiring, Frederick Gozali, and Dwi Mei Roito Sianturi. “Analisis Eksistensi Etika Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Berintegritas Dan Akuntabel.” Iblam Law Review 4, no. 2 (2024): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i2.406.

Toyi, Abdul Rahman, Fence M. Wantu, and Avelia Rahmah Y. Mantali. “Perbandingan Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan No. 282/Pid.B/2023/PN.Gto Dan No. 298/Pid.B/2023/PN.Gto: Suatu Telaah Atas Prinsip Kepastian Dan Keadilan Hukum.” Al-Zayn Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Hukum 3, no. 6 (2025): 8061–79. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i6.2503.

Widodo, Wahyu, Rizki Piet Darmawan, and Ariesto Narindro. “Penghitungan Proporsi Kerugian Pada Pendapatan Negara Berdasarkan Kualifikasi Kesengajaan Dan Kualifikasi Perbuatan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perpajakan.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 9, no. 4 (2024): 2309–21. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i4.15283.

Books

Lunis, Suhrawardi K. Etika Profes Hukum. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2000.

Nurohim, Muhammad, Leni Dwi Nirmala, Sandy Ari Wijaya, and Sumardi Efendi. Buku Referensi Hukum Pidana Asas, Teori Dan Praktik. Medan: PT. Media Penerbit Indonesia, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Moses Cristofel, Boedi Prasetyo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

How to Cite

Inconsistency in the Implementation of Corruption Criminalization Guidelines Based on PERMA No. 1 of 2020 in the Harvey Moeis Case Decision. (2025). JIHK, 7(2), 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.367