Judicial Inconsistency and Its Implications for Trademark Protection in Indonesia

Authors

  • Jeremy Exaudi Purba Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Wilma Silalahi Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.369

Keywords:

Judex Facti, Judex Juris, Interested Parties

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty and trademark protection for relevant parties arises from the inconsistency between the decisions of the Judex Facti and Judex Juris in trademark cancellation cases. This study aims to identify the nature of this inconsistency and its implications for trademark legal protection in Indonesia. Drawing on statutory regulations, Medan Commercial Court Decision No. 6/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022, and Supreme Court Decision No. 989 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2024, this normative legal research employs both case-based and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the Commercial Court adopts a narrow interpretation of “interested parties” and does not recognize first use as a legal basis, resulting in the dismissal of the trademark cancellation claim. In contrast, the Supreme Court applies a broader and more progressive interpretation by acknowledging historical use and identifying indications of bad faith in the trademark registration process. These divergent interpretations generate legal uncertainty, underscoring the need for harmonization between courts to ensure equitable trademark protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Aprita, Serlika, and Rio Adhitya. Filsafat Hukum. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2020. https://www.rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/filsafat-hukum-dr-serlika-aprita-s-h-m-h-rio-adhitya-s-t-s-h-m-kn/.

Ernanda, Astrid Dyah. “Efektivitas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terdaftar Dalam Mencegah Pemalsuan Dan Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia.” Padjadjaran Law Review 13, no. 1 (2025): 88–99. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v13i1.2213.

Fikriya, Makhyatul, Elan Jaelani, and Utang Rosidin. “Perbandingan Legal Standing Pengajuan Judicial Review Untuk Warga Negara Asing Di Negara Indonesia Dan Negara Jerman.” Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.70437/themis.v1i1.139.

Lestari, Widya Annisa Pudji, Yuniar Rahmatiar, and Muhamad Abas. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Atas Permohonan Merek Yang Diajukan Dengan Itikad Tidak Baik: Studi Putusan Nomor 1850 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2022.” Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 13, no. 3 (2025): 779–96. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i3.7604.

Lubis, Farah Zhafirah Putri, and Rahaditya Rahaditya. “Implementasi Prinsip First To Use Pada Pembatalan Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, no. 5 (2023): 3217–28. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11807.

Luntungan, Edward Imanuel. “Aspek Hukum Terkait Legal Standing Dalam Mengajukan Permohonan Ke Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Lex Privatum 16, no. 1 (2025): 1–12. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/61958.

Madril, Oce, and Jery Hasinand. “Perkembangan Kedudukan Hukum (Legal Standing) Dalam Pengujian Administratif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Uji Materi Di Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 4 (2021): 952–70. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3296.

Pratiwi, Nurul Iin. “Legal Implications of the Judex Facti Decision That Acquits the Defendant of Fraud in an Agreement.” Estudiante Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2023): 316–29. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v5i2.21797.

Books

Bainbridge, David I. Intellectual Property. 4th ed. London: Fitman Publishing, 1999.

Donandi, Sujana. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2019.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006.

Purwaningsih, Endang. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Kapita Selekta. 1st ed. Bandung: C.V. Mandar Maju, 2021. https://mandarmaju.com/main/detail/491/HAK-KEKAYAAN-INTELEKTUAL.

Sapteno, M. J., Handry Noya, Agastya Rama Listya, and Josefien Waas. Musik Dan Perlindungan Hukum Di Indonesia. Edited by Jermias H. Van Harling. Indramayu: Penerbit Adab, 2024. https://penerbitadab.id/musik-dan-perlindungan-hukum-di-indonesia/.

Siregar, Yulkarnaini, and Zetria Erma. Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Tasikmalaya: Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia, 2023.

Sulaiman, Sulaiman, Lswandi Lswandi, Achmad Surya, Putri Aryanlngrum, and Fahririn Fahririn. Perlindungan Hukum Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV Widina Media Utama, 2025.

Books

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 19 Tahun 1948 tentang Susunan dan Kekuasaan Badan-Badan Kehakiman (1948). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/25778/uu-no-19-tahun-1948.

———. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37595/uu-no-20-tahun-2016.

———. Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (2009). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38793/uu-no-48-tahun-2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Judicial Inconsistency and Its Implications for Trademark Protection in Indonesia. (2025). JIHK, 7(2), 1054-1067. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.369

Most read articles by the same author(s)