Reforming Mortgage Execution Norms to Enhance Justice for Debtors

Authors

  • Martinus Al Ibrani Giga Taufano Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Wilma Silalahi Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i1.293

Keywords:

Mortgage Rights, Procedural Violations, Debtor Protection, Legal Certainty

Abstract

The execution of mortgage rights under Article 6 of Law No. 4 of 1996 grants creditors direct authority to sell collateral through public auctions without requiring a court order. However, this practice frequently results in procedural violations that harm debtors and undermine the principle of justice. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing mortgage execution, identify common procedural violations in auction practices, and propose an ideal legal protection model for debtors. Employing a juridical-normative methodology, the study analyzes relevant laws and regulations alongside case documentation. The findings reveal a significant imbalance in the legal positions of creditors and debtors, primarily due to insufficient procedural oversight. The study concludes that reforming existing norms and enhancing supervisory mechanisms for execution auctions are essential to ensure legal certainty, protect debtor rights, and promote substantive justice within Indonesia’s collateral law system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Ferdinansyah, Ferdinansyah, M.S. Tumanggor, and Noviriska Noviriska. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah.” Action Research Literate 8, no. 4 (2024): 823–32. https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v8i4.281.

Haddina, Murni, and Adlin Budhiawan. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Harta Debitur Sebagai Objek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan: Studi Putusan No. 126/Pdt.G/2019/PN Kpn.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2023): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.4.2.7224.193-201.

Hadisantoso, Antonius Bernardus. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Terhadap Obyek Hak Tanggungan Yang Diletakkan Sita Jaminan: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor 321/PDT.G/2012/PN.JAKTIM Dan Nomor 211/PDT.G/2014/PN.JAK.TIM.” Sapienta et Virtus 3, no. 2 (2018): 104–21. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v3i2.180.

Hapsari, Elisabeth Putri. “Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan Untuk Pelunasan Kredit Macet.” Legalitatum 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–10. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/otentik/article/view/7129.

Kanter, Anjel Ria Meiliva, Mochammad Bakri, and Imam Koeswahyono. “Keabsahan Jual Beli Atas Objek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Oleh Bank Yang Dilakukan Tanpa Melalui Mekanisme Lelang.” Perspektif Hukum 17, no. 1 (2017): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v17i1.58.

Lumare, Lawrina Cristi Natalia, and Gunawan Djajaputra. “Identifikasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Pelaksanaan Lelang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2003. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.

Marnita, Marnita. “Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Pembiayaan Bermasalah: Studi Pada PT Bank Muamalat Indonesia Cabang Lampung.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 3 (2016): 525–44. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.791.

Maskanah, Ummi, Levina Abigail Chandra, Norika Manurung, and Aprilia Maharani Sule. “Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah Dalam Mengawasi Lelang Non Eksekusi Wajib Di Indonesia.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 306–14. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.585.

Nofiyanti, Dwi, Ramlani Lina Sinaulan, Yuhelson Yuhelson, and Vidi Galenso Syarief. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Akibat Wanprestasi Terkait Pelaksanaan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Dibawah Nilai Jual/Limit Terhadap Obyek Jaminan.” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research 4, no. 5 (2024): 4221–31. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15135.

Paramitha, Ni Made Shinta Teja, and I Ketut Markeling. “Eksistensi Surat Peringatan Kreditur Kepada Debitur Terkait Kredit Macet Dan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Lelang.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2014): 1–16. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/42596.

Pranoto, William Sudassi Akanittha, and Gatot P. Soemartono. “Legal Certainty of Creditor’s Rights in The Fiduciary Agreement.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 3054–68. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1097.

Prasetyo, Bony, Hartana Hartana, and G. Nyoman Tio Rae. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Pemilik Jaminan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lelang Hak Tanggungan Apabila Kreditur Beritikad Tidak Baik.” Jurnal Global Ilmiah 2, no. 2 (2024): 893–900. https://doi.org/10.55324/jgi.v2i2.140.

Pratiwi, Widya Sari, and Siti Mahmudah. “Implementasi Parate Eksekusi Sebagai Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah Pada Bank.” Pamali: Pattimura Magister Law Review 4, no. 3 (2024): 311–23. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2326.

Sabila, Putri Reyvita Ridha, Nabila Farahika, Iusti Arsista Safrin Candrasari, and Tasa Weharima. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Terhadap Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Akibat Kredit Macet.” Jurnal Education and Development 11, no. 1 (2022): 275–79. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/4456.

Yuningsih, Deity, Safril Sofwan Sanib, Muhammad Sjaiful, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Ruliah Ruliah, and Bahtiar Lamaronta. “Penerapan Asas Keadilan Terhadap Penetapan Limit Pada Proses Pelelangan Hak Tanggungan Di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Dan Lelang (KPKLP) Kota Kendari.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 4, no. 2 (2022): 149–167. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v4i2.41.

Proceedings

Hutapea, Jessica A Putri. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Mencapai Nilai Maksimum.” In National Conference on Law Studies, 2:448–63. Jakarta: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, 2020. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/ncols/article/view/1493.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-11

How to Cite

Taufano, M. A. I. G. ., & Silalahi, W. (2025). Reforming Mortgage Execution Norms to Enhance Justice for Debtors. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 7(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i1.293