Freedom of Panorama Terkait Pelindungan Karya Cipta di Ruang Publik Berdasarkan Hukum Hak Cipta dan Hukum Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi

  • Danetta Leoni Andrea 089672402385
  • Rika Ratna Permata Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Tasya Safiranita Universitas Padjadjaran
Keywords: Freedom of Panorama, Copyright, Legal Protection

Abstract

The presence of digital technology makes it easier for humans to create unlimited creative contents, for example in perpetuating copyrighted works in the public space and then being able to use them commercially or non-commercially on platforms or online media. This raises a problem, what if copyrighted works in public spaces that are immortalized and uploaded to online media are categorized as copyright infringement. Where in some countries, taking a portrait of a copyrighted work in a public space can only be done under the provisions of the Freedom of Panorama. The copyright law (UUHC) has not regulated the Freedom of Panorama and the protection of copyrighted works in the public space, as well as efforts to prevent violations by the government and platform providers have also not maximally provided protection for copyrighted works for uploaded contents

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asri, Dyah Permata Budi. “Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Produk Kreatif Usaha Kecil Menengah Di Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 27, no. 1 (2020): 130–50. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/download/13584/10277.
Atmadja, Hendra Tanu. “Urgensi Pelindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Era Perdagangan Bebas.” Jurnal Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 3 (2015): 192–201. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Lex/article/view/1220/1113.
Bureaux Internationaux Reunis pour la Protection de la Propriete Intellectuelle. “The Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.” In The Berne Convention, 1886.
Caselaw Access Project Harvard Law School. “United States District Court for the Southern District of New York PAGANO et Al. v. CHAS. BESELER CO. July 3, 1916,” 2020. https://cite.case.law/f/234/963/.
Cyber Harvard Edu. “Frank Gaylord V. United States United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit 595 F.3d 1364 (2010),” n.d. https://cyber.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/IP/2010_Gaylord.pdf.
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI. “Sejarah Perkembangan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual (KI),” 2019. https://dgip.go.id/tentang-djki/sejarah-djki#:~:text=Secara historis%2C peraturan perundang-undangan,UU Hak Cipta (1912).
Google. “Google Terms of Services,” n.d.
Haryono, and Agus Sutono. “Pengakuan Dan Perlindungan Hak Cipta Tinjauan Secara Filosofis Dan Teoritis.” Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS 6, no. 2 (2017): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.26877/civis.v6i2.1904.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Nomor 28, Pasal 40 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 4 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 5 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 8 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 28, Pasal 9 tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
———. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (1994).
Jened, Rahmi. Hukum Hak Cipta (Copyright’s Law). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Julianti, Lis, and Rika Putri Subekti. “Standar Perlindungan Hukum Kegiatan Investasi Pada Bisnis Jasa Pariwisata Di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicaksana 12, no. 2 (2018): 156–66. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.12.2.723.156-166.
Justitia. “Rock & Roll Hall of Fame & Museum, Inc. v. Gentile Prod., 71 F. Supp. 2d 755 (N.D. Ohio 1999),” n.d. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/71/755/2515490/.
Keane. “Pernyataan Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Auckland.” n.d.
New Zealand. Copyright, Chapter 94 (6) Act (1994).
———. Copyright Act, Chapter 73 (1994).
Newell, Bryce Clayton. “Freedom of Panorama: A Comparative Look at International Restrictions on Public Photography.” Creighton Law Review 44, no. 405 (2011).
Nugroho, Sigit. “Pelindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Pembangunan Ekonomi Di Era Pasar Bebas Asean.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Supremasi Hukum 24, no. 2 (2015): 2015. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/supremasihukum/article/view/1199.
Perry, Mark. Copyright and (Dis)Harmonisation: Can Developing Nations Prioritise Their Own Public Good in a Global Copyright Hegemony?: The Reconceptualisation of Copyright. Copyright, Property and the Social Contract. Australia, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95690-9_5.
Pricillia, Luh Mas Putri, and I Made Subawa. “Akibat Hukum Pengunggahan Karya Cipta Film Tanpa Izin Pencipta Di Media Sosial.” Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 11 (2018): 1–15. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/41736.
Rosnay, Mélanie Dulong De, and Pierre-Carl Langlais. “Public Artworks and the Freedom of Panorama Controversy: A Case of Wikimedia Influence.” Internet Policy Review 6, no. 1 (2017). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315885676_Public_artworks_and_the_freedom_of_panorama_controversy_a_case_of_Wikimedia_influence.
Shtefan, Anna. “New Voices Freedom of Panorama: The Eu Experience.” European Journal of Legal Studies 11, no. 2 (2019): 13–27. https://ejls.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2019/05/2-EJLS-112-Shtefan.pdf.
Sudjana, Sudjana. “Pembatasan Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual (Hak Cipta) Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal HAM 10, no. 1 (2019): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2019.10.69-83.
The United States of America. 17 U.S.C. 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general (2012).
———. 17 U.S.C. 106 - Exclusive rights in copyrighted works (2011).
———. 17 U.S.C. 120 Scope of exclusive rights in architectural works (2011).
Published
2022-04-25
How to Cite
Andrea, D. L., Permata, R. R., & Safiranita, T. (2022). Freedom of Panorama Terkait Pelindungan Karya Cipta di Ruang Publik Berdasarkan Hukum Hak Cipta dan Hukum Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi . Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 2(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v2i1.133