The Urgency of Implementing the Insolvency Test in Bankruptcy Cases in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Nisrawanty Lembang
Iryana Anwar

Abstract

The process of resolving bankruptcy cases in Indonesia, which only determines two simple requirements for debtors to be declared bankrupt as stipulated in the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004, has resulted in many cases of debtors still in a solvent state but declared bankrupt. This research focuses on the urgency of applying the insolvency test to bankruptcy cases in Indonesia, with the aim of knowing how the urgency of applying the insolvency test in Indonesia, and also knowing how judges apply the concept of the insolvency test even though the insolvency test has not been regulated in the bankruptcy provisions in Indonesia. Normative research using a conceptual approach, and a case approach results in a conclusion that the bankruptcy of a debtor who is still solvent is something that is not in accordance with the principles of bankruptcy. Therefore, it is necessary to have an insolvency test instrument to assess the solvency of the debtor. In addition, this research also found several cases where the panel of judges applied the concept of insolvency test in considering the case being handled.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lembang , N. ., & Anwar, I. (2024). The Urgency of Implementing the Insolvency Test in Bankruptcy Cases in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 6(2), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v6i2.219
Section
Articles

References

Books

Elyta Ras Ginting, Hukum Kepailitan Teori Kepailitan, Sleman:Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Grant W. Newton, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Accounting: Practice and Procedure ed. 7, (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2009)

Sutan Remi Sjahdeini, Sejarah, Asas dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. (Jakarta:Kencana, 2016).

Journals

Adi Nugroho S. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keadaan Insolvensi Dalam Kepailitan (Studi Normatif Pasal 2 ayat 1 Undang-undang No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran’’ Brawijaya Law Student Journal 1, no 3 (2013) :

Charina Putri B, Tazkya Salsabila dan Shrishti, “Urgensi terhadap penerapan insolvency test, dalam penetapan status pailit di Indonesia”. Jurnal Universitas taruma negara (2021):85-92, https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/PSERINA/article/view/16147/8924

Hervana Wahyu Prihatmaka, Sunarmi dan Rahmad Hendra, “Insolvensy dalam hukum kepailitan di indonesia (Studi Putusan No.48/Pailit/2012/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.Antara PT.Telkomsel seluler Vs Pt Primajaya Informatika” Fiat justitia 8, no.2(2014);326-341, https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat/article/download/295/254

Isis Ikhwansyah dan Lambok Marisi Jakobus Sidabutar “The Implementation of Insolvency Test on Debtors’ Bankruptcy in Performing the Principle of Justice” Jurnal Media Hukum 26, no 2 (2019):240-251, https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/6131

Joyse Andreas, Prinsip Umum Kepailitan, Instrumen Insolvensi dan Aspek Ekonomi PKPU dalam Alif Kurnia Putra dalam Alif Kurnia Putra “Keabsahan Penolakan Permohonan Pailit Berdasarkan alasan Debitor dalam keadaan Solven” Jurnal Universitas Airlangga 2, no 4 (2019):1147-1163 https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JD/article/view/14484/8010

Kendry Tan, “Mencegah Kepailitan Debitor saat Pandemi Covid-19:Manfaat Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang & Insolvency Test”, Jurnal Of Judicial Review 24 no.2 (2022): 305-318 https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jjr/article/download/7363/2925

Levinthal dalam Revita Pirena Putri, dan Endang Prasetyawati.“Urgensi Pengaturan Prinsip Minimal Utang Sebagai syarat kepailitan bagi Debitor”: Bureaucracy Journal 3, no 1 (2023):507-517 https://bureaucracy.gapenas-publisher.org/index.php/home/article/view/197

Luh ayu Maheswari Prabaningsih, Made Nurmawati, “Pengaturan insolvency test dalam penjatuhan putusan pailit terhadap perusahaan”, Jurnal Ilmu hukum Kertha Semaya 7, no 8 (2019): 1-15 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/da66/77414556817ad692bce027231bfaecd968e5.pdf

M. Hadi Subhan. “Insolvency test Melindungi perusahaan solven yang beritikad baik dari penyalahgunaan kepailitan”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 33, no 17 (2014): 11-30 https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=EX-Tbo4AAAAJ&citation_for_view=EX-Tbo4AAAAJ:u9iWguZQMMsC

Serlika Aprita.”Asas kelangsungan usaha sebagai landasan filosofis perlindungan hukum bagi debitor pailit sehubungan tidak adanya insolvensi test dalam penyelesaian sengketa kepailitan”. Jurnal Nurani, 17 no 2 (2017): 153-178, https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/Nurani/article/view/1842/1506

Tata Wijayanta.”Kajian tentang pengaturan syarat kepailitan menurut Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004”. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 26 no 1 (2014):1-13

Website

Nirmala, ’Kepastian hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa perkara kepailitan’ (Binus University Business law, 30 April 2018) <https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/04/30/kepastian-hukum-dalam-penyelesaian-perkara-kepailitan/> diakses 6 Maret 2023.

Liputan 6, ’Kilgour:Kasus Msnulife Tak Merusak Hubungan Indonesia-Kanada’ (Liputan 6, 22 Juni 2002) <https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/36477/kilgour-kasus-manulife-tak-meru sak-hubungan-indonesia-kanada> diakses 6 Maret 2023.2018.pdf diakses 3 April 2023.

Court Decision

PT Golden Spike Energy Indonesia, Vs Pt. Global Pacific Energy, Nomor 385 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014, 21 Oktober 2014.

PT. Asuransi Jiwa Bumi Asih Jaya selanjutnya Vs Dewan Komisioner Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, NOMOR 04/PDT-SUS-PAILIT /2015/PN.Niaga Jakarta Pusat Jo No.27Pdt.Sus.PKPU/2015/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat, 16 April 2015.

PT. Sumber Daya Nusaphala (PT. SDN), PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), VS Tbk dengan Sinatra Liman, Putusan No. 297 K/PDT.SUS/2011, 8 Juni 2011.

Legislation

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang