The Urgency of Implementing the Insolvency Test in Bankruptcy Cases in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
The process of resolving bankruptcy cases in Indonesia, which only determines two simple requirements for debtors to be declared bankrupt as stipulated in the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004, has resulted in many cases of debtors still in a solvent state but declared bankrupt. This research focuses on the urgency of applying the insolvency test to bankruptcy cases in Indonesia, with the aim of knowing how the urgency of applying the insolvency test in Indonesia, and also knowing how judges apply the concept of the insolvency test even though the insolvency test has not been regulated in the bankruptcy provisions in Indonesia. Normative research using a conceptual approach, and a case approach results in a conclusion that the bankruptcy of a debtor who is still solvent is something that is not in accordance with the principles of bankruptcy. Therefore, it is necessary to have an insolvency test instrument to assess the solvency of the debtor. In addition, this research also found several cases where the panel of judges applied the concept of insolvency test in considering the case being handled.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Books
Elyta Ras Ginting, Hukum Kepailitan Teori Kepailitan, Sleman:Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Grant W. Newton, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Accounting: Practice and Procedure ed. 7, (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2009)
Sutan Remi Sjahdeini, Sejarah, Asas dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. (Jakarta:Kencana, 2016).
Journals
Adi Nugroho S. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keadaan Insolvensi Dalam Kepailitan (Studi Normatif Pasal 2 ayat 1 Undang-undang No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran’’ Brawijaya Law Student Journal 1, no 3 (2013) :
Charina Putri B, Tazkya Salsabila dan Shrishti, “Urgensi terhadap penerapan insolvency test, dalam penetapan status pailit di Indonesia”. Jurnal Universitas taruma negara (2021):85-92, https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/PSERINA/article/view/16147/8924
Hervana Wahyu Prihatmaka, Sunarmi dan Rahmad Hendra, “Insolvensy dalam hukum kepailitan di indonesia (Studi Putusan No.48/Pailit/2012/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.Antara PT.Telkomsel seluler Vs Pt Primajaya Informatika” Fiat justitia 8, no.2(2014);326-341, https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat/article/download/295/254
Isis Ikhwansyah dan Lambok Marisi Jakobus Sidabutar “The Implementation of Insolvency Test on Debtors’ Bankruptcy in Performing the Principle of Justice” Jurnal Media Hukum 26, no 2 (2019):240-251, https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/6131
Joyse Andreas, Prinsip Umum Kepailitan, Instrumen Insolvensi dan Aspek Ekonomi PKPU dalam Alif Kurnia Putra dalam Alif Kurnia Putra “Keabsahan Penolakan Permohonan Pailit Berdasarkan alasan Debitor dalam keadaan Solven” Jurnal Universitas Airlangga 2, no 4 (2019):1147-1163 https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JD/article/view/14484/8010
Kendry Tan, “Mencegah Kepailitan Debitor saat Pandemi Covid-19:Manfaat Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang & Insolvency Test”, Jurnal Of Judicial Review 24 no.2 (2022): 305-318 https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/jjr/article/download/7363/2925
Levinthal dalam Revita Pirena Putri, dan Endang Prasetyawati.“Urgensi Pengaturan Prinsip Minimal Utang Sebagai syarat kepailitan bagi Debitor”: Bureaucracy Journal 3, no 1 (2023):507-517 https://bureaucracy.gapenas-publisher.org/index.php/home/article/view/197
Luh ayu Maheswari Prabaningsih, Made Nurmawati, “Pengaturan insolvency test dalam penjatuhan putusan pailit terhadap perusahaan”, Jurnal Ilmu hukum Kertha Semaya 7, no 8 (2019): 1-15 https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/da66/77414556817ad692bce027231bfaecd968e5.pdf
M. Hadi Subhan. “Insolvency test Melindungi perusahaan solven yang beritikad baik dari penyalahgunaan kepailitan”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 33, no 17 (2014): 11-30 https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=EX-Tbo4AAAAJ&citation_for_view=EX-Tbo4AAAAJ:u9iWguZQMMsC
Serlika Aprita.”Asas kelangsungan usaha sebagai landasan filosofis perlindungan hukum bagi debitor pailit sehubungan tidak adanya insolvensi test dalam penyelesaian sengketa kepailitan”. Jurnal Nurani, 17 no 2 (2017): 153-178, https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/Nurani/article/view/1842/1506
Tata Wijayanta.”Kajian tentang pengaturan syarat kepailitan menurut Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004”. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 26 no 1 (2014):1-13
Website
Nirmala, ’Kepastian hukum dalam penyelesaian sengketa perkara kepailitan’ (Binus University Business law, 30 April 2018) <https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/04/30/kepastian-hukum-dalam-penyelesaian-perkara-kepailitan/> diakses 6 Maret 2023.
Liputan 6, ’Kilgour:Kasus Msnulife Tak Merusak Hubungan Indonesia-Kanada’ (Liputan 6, 22 Juni 2002) <https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/36477/kilgour-kasus-manulife-tak-meru sak-hubungan-indonesia-kanada> diakses 6 Maret 2023.2018.pdf diakses 3 April 2023.
Court Decision
PT Golden Spike Energy Indonesia, Vs Pt. Global Pacific Energy, Nomor 385 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014, 21 Oktober 2014.
PT. Asuransi Jiwa Bumi Asih Jaya selanjutnya Vs Dewan Komisioner Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, NOMOR 04/PDT-SUS-PAILIT /2015/PN.Niaga Jakarta Pusat Jo No.27Pdt.Sus.PKPU/2015/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat, 16 April 2015.
PT. Sumber Daya Nusaphala (PT. SDN), PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), VS Tbk dengan Sinatra Liman, Putusan No. 297 K/PDT.SUS/2011, 8 Juni 2011.
Legislation
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang