Authority of The Auditor of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) to Reveal State Losses in Corruption Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v1i1.119Keywords:
Authority of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency Auditors, State Losses, Corruption CrimesAbstract
This study aims to determine the authority relationship between Finance and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) Auditor and the South Sulawesi Police Institution, the legal status of the BPKP auditor's inspection and evidence in criminal procedural law, and obstacles in the BPKP auditor's inspection. This study employed an empirical juridical approach to identify how a rule actually applies in society. The data were obtained through field observations, interviews with investigators from South Sulawesi Police Institution and BPKP Auditor, and the study of various related documents. The results showed that the authority between The Regional Police and the BPKP Auditor was only dependent on a request for assistance to carry out financial and state economic calculations based on a cooperation agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the National Police Institution and BPKP. Therefore, the BPKP indeed plays a role in revealing corruption indications despite its authority only for calculating state losses, where if the BPKP’s audit report states a loss, the Regional Police Investigator increases the stage of the Investigation, but if the results state no loss, the investigation will be stopped. Thus, there is no indication of corruption.
Downloads
References
Jurnal
Entah, Aloysius R. “Indonesia’s Position as a Rule of Law Based on Pancasila.” Law Research Review Quarterly 2, no. 4 (2016): 533–42. https://doi.org/10.15294/snh.v2i01.21340.
Illahi, Beni Kurnia, and Muhammad Ikhsan Alia. “Pertanggungjawaban Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Melalui Kerja Sama BPK Dan KPK.” Integritas 3, no. 2 (2017): 37–78. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i2.102.
Isnawati, Isnawati. “Perspektif Hukum Dalam Pengawasan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.” Journal of Law 1, no. 2 (2013): 95–108. http://ejurnal.untag-smd.ac.id/index.php/DD/article/view/627.
Iswara, Made Nara, and I Gusti Ayu Agung Ari Krisnawati. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Pengakuan Yang Diberikan Di Luar Persidangan.” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 3 (2016): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v5.i2.p199-218.
Permana, Tri Cahya Indra. “Wewenang Badan Pengawas Keuangan Dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Menghitung Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 1, no. 1 (2018): 101–10. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.112018.%25p.
Prabowo, Hendi Yogi, and Kathie Cooper. “Re-Understanding Corruption in the Indonesian Public Sector through Three Behavioral Lenses.” Journal of Financial Crime 23, no. 4 (2016): 1028–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2015-0039.
Rahmanto, Isnan, and Indah Linar Kinarsih. “Penataan Kelembagaan Pembiayaan Pembangunan.” Warta Pengawasan 23, no. 4 (2016): 2–13. https://www.bpkp.go.id/puslitbangwas/konten/3567/Jurnal-Pengawasan.
Rosyadi, Muhammad Imron. “Wewenang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Dan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan Dalam Menilai Kerugian Keuangan Negara.” Mimbar Keadilan 3, no. 1 (2016): 27–56. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2206.
Tampubolon, Samuel Mangapul. “Peran Pemerintah Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Kaitannya Dengan Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2004.” Lex et Societatis 2, no. 6 (2014): 138–46. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/5380.
Tesis
Mening, Elia Jesika, and Dwi Haryati. “Analisis Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Memeriksa Dokumen Rahasia Wajib Pajak Sebagai Bagian Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan Dan Tanggungjawab Keuangan Negara.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2016.
Buku
Adisasmita, Rahardjo. Pengelolaan Pendapatan Dan Anggaran Daerah. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2011.
Ginsburg, Tom, and Aziz Z. Huq. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.
Kenedi, John. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Penal Policy). Edited by M Sirajuddin. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
Murhaini, Suriansyah. Aspek Hukum Pengawasan Pemerintah Daerah. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Mediatama, 2008.
Poernomo, Bambang. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1992.
Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Delik Korupsi (UU No. 20 Tahun 2001). Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2009.
Wawancara
Ahsan, Muhammad. “Wawancara Aspidsus Kasi Penuntutan Kejaksaan Tinggi Sulawesi Selatan.” 2018.
Auditor BPKP. “Wawancara Auditor BPKP Sulawesi Selatan.” 2018.
Internet
Political and Economic Risk Consultancy. Ltd. PERC. “The World’s Corruption Case,” 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
