Returning Land Title Certificates to Parties Other Than the Registered Rights Holder in Criminal Judgments

Authors

  • Latu Rangga Mito Sejati Universitas Narotama Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Himawan Estu Bagijo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/4njcq250

Keywords:

Evidentiary Return, Land Title Certificate, Land Ownership, Legal Certainty

Abstract

The return of land title certificates admitted as evidence in criminal proceedings raises legal concerns when the designated recipient differs from the registered rights holder. This study examines the consistency of the legal reasoning in Mojokerto District Court Judgment No. 136/Pid.B/2023/PN.Mjk concerning Certificate of Ownership (Sertifikat Hak Milik [SHM]) No. 4177, registered in the name of Moh. Saifuddin Annafabi. It also develops an analytical framework for distinguishing the return of evidence from the formal determination of land ownership. Using normative legal research, this study employs statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, followed by prescriptive qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that the designation of STIT Raden Wijaya Mojokerto as the recipient of the certificate must be distinguished from a definitive determination of land ownership. Trial testimony and the status of the registered rights holder underscore the need to verify the legal basis for any transfer of land rights. This study concludes that the legal analysis should address three distinct aspects: the return of evidence, the validity of the transfer of land rights, and the recipient’s legal capacity to hold such rights. Distinguishing these aspects is essential to strengthening legal certainty in land ownership.

References

REFERENCES

Journals

Akbar, Muhammad Alif Prayuta. “Wanprestasi Dalam Akta Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Dan Bangunan Yang Masuk Dalam Boedel Pailit: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 687 PK/Pdt/2016.” Indonesian Notary 4, no. 1 (2022): 22.

Bur, Arifin, and Desi Apriani. “Sertifikat Sebagai Alat Pembuktian Yang Kuat Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran Tanah.” UIR Law Review 1, no. 02 (2017): 127–36. https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2017.1.02.952.

Bur, Arifin, Thamrin S, and Ardiansyah Ardiansyah. “Pemberian Hak Milik Atas Tanah Badan Keagamaan Pada Yayasan Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Menurut Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage 3, no. 1 (2019): 99–104.

Chairunissa, Syaira, Rembrandt Rembrandt, and Yasniwati Yasniwati. “Putusan MA Membatalkan Sertifikat, Memulihkan Status Tanah Serta Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Atasnya.” Jurnal Niara 19, no. 1 (2026): 240–48. https://doi.org/10.31849/g4d40661.

Grey, Andrew. “Proses Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Karena Akta Jual Beli Yang Cacat Hukum: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 72/G/ 2018/PTUN.BDG.” Indonesian Notary 2 (2020): 2.

Haryanto, Agus Dwi. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Kuasa Menjual.” Jurnal Bevinding 1, no. 1 (2023): 102–9.

Kurniaji, Danar Fiscusia. “Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 3 (2017): 433–56. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.786.

Maulana, Immoto Qoonita Naflah, Siti Dhiya Tiara, Keysyah Aulia Hidayat, and Sri Handayani. “Konsistensi Pertimbangan Hakim Upaya Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Sengketa Perdata Kepemilikan Tanah: Analisis Putusan Nomor 16/PDT/2020/PT PLG.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 3, no. 2 (2026): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v3i2.1611.

Mulyani, Theresia. “Upaya Hukum Pengembalian Objek Waris Akibat Peralihan Dan Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Tanpa Persetujuan Pemegang Hak.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5, no. 4 (2025): 2704–14. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.3679.

Naimah, Siti, Rahmadi Indra Tektona, and Fanny Tanuwijaya. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Preventif Bagi Notaris Dan Para Pihak.” Seikat: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 5, no. 4 (2026): 2983–90. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3445.

Nugraha, Yodi, Rembrandt Rembrandt, and Syofirman Sofyan. “Kepastian Hukum Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Dengan Dasar Penerbitan Surat Palsu: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batusangkar Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 1724–36. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.968.

Puteri, Marsya Duni. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Hak Atas Tanah Yang Telah Dialihkan Dan Dibebankan Hak Tanggungan.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 9 (2026): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i9.2354.

Sihite, Lamrotiur, Elisabeth N. Butarbutar, and Benar Sinuraya. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Sebagai Alat Buktidalam Perkara Perdata: Studi Putusan Nomor: 34/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Kbj.” Fiat Iustitia: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v3i1.2128.

Taolin, Fitriana Trinengsi, Dian Aries Mujiburohman, and Koes Widarbo. “Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah.” Tunas Agraria 7, no. 1 (2024): 68–85. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v7i1.277.

Yuningsih, Deity, Ruliah Ruliah, Siti Muslimah Suciati, and Sukring Sukring. “Peningkatan Pengakuan Hukum Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Tidak Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” Halu Oleo Law Review 8, no. 1 (2024): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v8i1.108.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Returning Land Title Certificates to Parties Other Than the Registered Rights Holder in Criminal Judgments. (2026). JIHK, 8(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.46924/4njcq250