Valid a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement, Rights Not Yet Transferred

Legal Construction of Breach of Contract and Notary Liability

Authors

  • Nivi Esther Fitriayu Hutabarat Universitas Pancasila
  • B. F. Sihombing Universitas Pancasila Jakarta, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Oka Setiawan Universitas Pancasila Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i2.481

Keywords:

PPJB, Agreement Validity, Breach of Contract, Notary Liability

Abstract

Discrepancies between the execution of a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) and the transfer of land rights may result in breach of contract, legal uncertainty, and questions concerning the scope of Notary/Land Deed Official (PPAT) liability. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation and implementation of PPJBs, the authority of Notaries/PPATs, and the causes, forms, and legal consequences of breach of contract based on Karanganyar District Court Decision Number 28/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Krg. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, supported by a literature review and information obtained from a Notary. A PPJB that satisfies the requirements of Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code is legally binding on the parties pursuant to Article 1338; however, it does not automatically effectuate the transfer of land rights. A breach of contract arises from the failure to perform contractual obligations, whereas the liability of a Notary/PPAT depends on whether the official has violated duties imposed by law. The findings underscore the importance of distinguishing between the validity of an agreement, the authenticity of a deed, breach of contract, and the transfer of land rights. This distinction is essential for determining the respective legal consequences and liabilities arising from a PPJB.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Ali. Menguak Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis Dan Sosiologis). Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 2002.

Boedi Harsono. Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria: Isi Dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2003.

Dominikus Rato. Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami Dan Memahami Hukum. Yogjakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2010.

Effendi Perangin. Hukum Agraria Di Indonesia: Suatu Telaah Dari Sudut Pandang Praktisi Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008.

Habib Adji. Merajut Pemikiran Dalam Dunia Notaris & PPAT. Bandung: Citra Adi Bakti, 2014.

Herlien Budiono. “Pengikatan Jual Beli Dan Kuasa Mutlak.” Majalah Renvoi, 2004.

Herry Susanto. Peranan Notaris Dalam Menciptakan Kepatutan Dalam Kontrak. Yogjakarta: Fakultas Hukum UII, 2010.

Okta Vianus Puspa Negara Armansyah. “Kedudukan Hukum Akta PPJB Akibat Wanprestasi (Analisis Putusan Nomor 2362 K/PDT/2019).” Jurnal Imanot 2, no. 1 (2022): 421.

Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) (n.d.).

Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Vol. 51. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2019.

Soesilo & Pramudji R. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. 1st ed. Jakarta: Rhedbook Publisher, 2008.

Sri Mamudji. Metode Penelitian Dan Penulisan Hukum. Vol. 6. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FH UI, 2005.

Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. 14th ed. PT Intermasa, 2022.

Sumaryono. Jual Beli Tanah Yang Dilakukan Tanpa Akta Jual Beli PPAT. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2009.

Yahman. Karakteristik Wanprestasi Dan Tindakan Pidana Penipuan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Valid a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement, Rights Not Yet Transferred: Legal Construction of Breach of Contract and Notary Liability. (2026). JIHK, 8(2), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i2.481