Cassation-Level Sentencing Disparities and the Future of Criminal Justice in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46924/5fn4kt91Keywords:
Sentencing Disparity, Criminal Punishment, Cassation Decision, 2023 Criminal CodeAbstract
Sentencing disparities in serious criminal cases frequently generate debate concerning fairness, legal certainty, and the consistency of judicial decision-making, as reflected in the commutation of the death penalty to life imprisonment in Supreme Court Decision Number 813 K/Pid/2023 involving FS. This study aims to analyze sentencing disparities between appellate and cassation court decisions and to examine the implications of sentencing reforms under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code for judicial reasoning patterns and sentencing proportionality. The study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches, analyzed through a qualitative framework. The findings indicate that vertical sentencing disparities arise from differing penal philosophies adopted by the judex facti and judex juris. Furthermore, the 2023 Criminal Code has begun to shape judicial reasoning toward a more rehabilitative and humanistic approach to punishment. The study concludes that penal reform requires clearer sentencing guidelines to promote consistency in judicial decisions, strengthen legal certainty, and achieve substantive justice.
Downloads
References
Journals
Andrew Trinovada and Hery Firmansyah. “Pengurangan Hukuman Pidana Terdakwa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Pada Tingkat Kasasi Oleh Mahkamah Agung: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 816 K/Pid/2023.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 9, no. 3 (2024): 1603–15. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i3.14601.
Effendi, Erdianto. “Expansion of Interpretation of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code in Pre-Trial Authority:” Paper presented at 2nd Riau Annual Meeting on Law and Social Sciences (RAMLAS 2021). 2022. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220406.026.
Fitria, Ferisa Dian, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, and Abdul Madjid. “Sentencing Under The Special Minimum Threat For Small-Scale Drug Traffickers: Challenges And Implications For Justice And Drug Eradication Policy.” International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) 4, no. 3 (2024): 1363–72. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1336.
Henham, Ralph. “Sentencing Policy, Social Values and Discretionary Justice.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 42, no. 4 (2022): 1093–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac011.
Isman Isman. “Pertimbanganhakim Kasasi Dalam Kasus Sambo Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Penerapan Norma Pembunuhan Berencana Dalam KUHP 2023.” Lex Jurnalica 20, no. 3 (2023): 291–301. https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v20i3.7329.
Kayla Fellicia Putri, Cleo Patricia Joe, Naura Nareswari, Hera Aprillya Dwi Lestari, and Mulyadi Mulyadi. “Perubahan Hukum Pidana Dalam Kasus Ferdy Sambo Dan Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Putusan Kasasi.” Syariah: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2025): 148–53. https://doi.org/10.62017/syariah.v3i2.6603.
Marbun, Rocky, and Agus Solichien. “Disparity of the Application of Adequate Legal Considerations: The Truth-Games in Criminal Court Decisions.” KnE Social Sciences, October 4, 2022, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12098.
Muhammad Ilham Akbar akbar, Khansa Auliya, Muhammad Rafii Ikram, Silmi Kaaffah, and Muthia Meylani Putri. “Keadilan Antara Masyarakat Dengan Analisis Persepsi Keadilan Antara Masyarakat Dengan Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Kasus Pembunuhan Oleh Ferdy Sambo.” Legal System Journal 1, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.70656/lsj.v1i2.143.
Ranubaya, Fransesco Agnes, Reginald Siddarta, and Yohanes Endi. “Analisis Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Brigadir J Oleh Ferdi Sambo: Dalam Tinjauan Norma Moral Obyektif & Subyektif.” Gloria Justitia 4, no. 1 (2024): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.25170/gloriajustitia.v4i1.5430.
Siallagan, Haposan. “Penerapan Prinsip Negara Hukum Di Indonesia.” Sosiohumaniora 18, no. 2 (2016): 131–37. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9947.
Proceedings
Sargeant, Holli, and Måns Magnusson. “Formalising Anti-Discrimination Law in Automated Decision Systems.” Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, June 23, 2025, 181–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732015.
Thesis
Intan Alfiyatur Rizqiyah. “Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Terkait Putusan Seumur Hidup Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana.” Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, 2024. http://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/id/eprint/37374.
Prima Audisyam Ananda. “Pemeriksaan Kasasi Oleh Mahkamah Agung Yang Terbatas Pada Judex Juris.” Sriwijaya Sriwijaya, 2026. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/193061/.
Wilda Nadia Fitri. “Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana: Studi Putusan MA No. 813 K/Pid/2023 Dan Putusan MA No. 498 K/Pid/2017.” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2024. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/84460.
Books
Hamidah Abdurrachman, Rahmad Agung Nugraha, and Nayla Majestya. Palu Hakim Versus Rasa Keadilan Sebuah Pengantar Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Deepublish, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lisa Rahmasari, Romaida Hutabarat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Sinta ID: 
