The Annulment of a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) Deed on Procedural Grounds

Who Protects the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners?

Authors

  • Dinada Rindu Asmara Dailapasa Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Indonesia
  • Agung Iriantoro Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Indonesia
  • Luh Rina Apriani Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.452

Keywords:

Procedural Defects, Legal Protection, Directors And Commissioners, Annulment of Deed

Abstract

The dismissal of directors and commissioners through a procedurally defective General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) generates legal uncertainty and creates opportunities for the abuse of authority within limited liability companies. This study aims to examine the legal consequences arising from the annulment of GMS minutes that are procedurally flawed and to analyze the effectiveness of legal protection afforded to corporate organs. The research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing a statutory approach and a case study of Decision Number 214/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Utr. The findings indicate that a procedurally defective GMS deed is deemed null and void and, therefore, lacks binding legal force, resulting in the restoration of the positions of the directors and commissioners. In conclusion, legal protection has been relatively effective through civil and corporate law mechanisms; however, enhanced oversight and stricter procedural compliance remain necessary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Fauzan, Muhammad Iqbal, Isis Ikhwansyah, and Nanda A. Lubis. “Keabsahan Berita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pewarisan Saham Perseroan Terbatas.” Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2020): 305–20.

Hanako, Gusnia, Hasim Purba, and Mahmul Siregar. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Notaris Terhadap Akta Partij Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Dan Akta Partij Putusan Sirkuler Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas: Studi Putusan Nomor 46/PDT.G/2023/PN CBI Jo. 236/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Bdg Jo. 141/Pdt.G/2018/PN Blb.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 4 (2025): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1434.

Inma, Clara Venesia. “Implikasi Pembatalan Akta Berita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Tentang Hibah Saham.” Jurnal Officium Notarium 1, no. 2 (2021): 241–47. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss2.art4.

Malela, Gita Regina, Hasim Purba, Rudi Haposan Siahaan, and Suprayitno Suprayitno. “Akta Berita Acara Rapat Yang Tidak Sesuai Tata Cara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 773 PK/Pdt/2019.” Jurnal Media Akademik 2, no. 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.62281/v2i4.267.

Megawati, Megawati. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Terkait Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum Oleh Pengadilan Karena Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah 4, no. 6 (2025): 2045–60. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i6.11495.

Salma, Ta’tiana. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas: Studi Putusan Nomor 10/Pdt.G.S/2023/Pn.Pdg.” “182–191.” Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum 19, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1418.

Saphira, Riva Mahfuzhah. “Implikasi Hukum Pembatalan Akta Jual Beli Saham Akibat Pembeli Cidera Janji: Analisis Kasus Pada Putusan No. 105/ Pdt.G/2021/Pn Jkt.Sel.” Indonesian Notary 7, no. 2 (2025): 246–66. https://doi.org/10.21143/notary.vol7.no2.246.

Thesis

Sarah, Sarah. “Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Dan Akta Yang Dibuatnya Terkait Adanya Keterangan Palsu Dalam Akta Berita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Berkaitan Dengan Pengalihan Saham Perseroan.” Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2019. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/27087.

Books

Azizah, Azizah. Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Intimedia, 2015.

Claes, Erik, Wouter Devroe, and Bert Keirsbilck, eds. Facing the Limits of the Law. Springer, 2009.

Habib Adjie. Majelis Pengawas Notaris. 2nd ed. Refika Aditama, 2015. https://refika.co.id/60-majelis-pengawas-notaris.html.

Habib Adjie and Aep Gunarsa. Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. 5th ed. Refika Aditama, 2018.

Huda, Chairul. Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Kencana, 2015.

Samsaimun Samsaimun. Peraturan Jabatan PPAT. 1st ed. Pustaka Reka Cipta, 2018.

Yani, Ahmad, and Gunawan Widjaya. Seri Hukum Bisnis Perseroan Terbatas. Sinar Grafika, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Dinada Rindu Asmara Dailapasa, Agung Iriantoro, Luh Rina Apriani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

How to Cite

The Annulment of a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) Deed on Procedural Grounds: Who Protects the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners?. (2026). JIHK, 8(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.452