The Draft Asset Confiscation Law in the Recovery of State Losses

Authors

  • Rifqi Dwi Bachtiar Rifqi Universitas Muria Kudus
  • Hidayatullah Universitas Muria Kudus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.429

Keywords:

State Loss, Corruption, Asset Forfeiture

Abstract

Corruption constitutes an extraordinary crime that generates multidimensional harms and significantly undermines state finances. The effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts should be assessed not only through the punishment of offenders but also through the state’s capacity to recover losses by means of asset recovery mechanisms. This study examines efforts to recover state losses within the Indonesian criminal law system, analyzes the normative, structural, and practical obstacles encountered, and evaluates the urgency and relevance of the Asset Confiscation Bill as an alternative legal policy. Employing normative legal research, this study adopts statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case-based approaches. The findings indicate that state loss recovery mechanisms reliant on the criminal punishment of offenders remain suboptimal due to the complexity of corruption offenses and the limitations of existing legal instruments. Accordingly, the enactment of the Asset Confiscation Bill, grounded in an asset-based approach, represents a strategic measure to enhance the effectiveness of state loss recovery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Hidayatullah, Universitas Muria Kudus

    Magister Hukum, Universitas Muria Kudus

References

Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Korupsi ,Good Governance,Dan Komisi Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman, 2002.

Aulia Rahman, Mispansyah. “Pidana Tambahan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dengan Mencicil Dalam Perspetif Yang Berkeadilan.” Rio Law Jurnal 5, no. 2 (2024): 623–35.

Bidjuni, Ryan Keynes, Ramdhan Kasim, and Dince Aisa Kodai. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Melalui Cryptocurrency Di Indonesia.” GJR: Gorontalo Justice Research 1, no. 1 (2025): 208–18.

Cassella, Stefan D. ASSET FORFEITURE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES. New Yok: Juris Publishing, 2016.

Fadhila, Yanuar Ramadhana. “Perlindungan Pihak Ketiga Beriktikad Baik Dalam Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Legal Protection of Bona Fide Third Parties in Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Againts Corruption ( UNCAC ) . 4 Konvensi Yang Diinisiasi Oleh Perserikatan Bangsa-B.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 3 (2025): 8–11.

Hafid, Irwan. “Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law.” Lex Renaissan 6, no. 1 (2021): 465–80.

Hamzah, Andi. PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI MELALUI : Hukum Pidana Nasional Dan Internasional. Cetakan Pe. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2005.

Husein, Yunus. “PENJELASAN HUKUM TENTANG PERAMPASAN ASET TANPA PEMIDANAAN DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Jakarta, 2019.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media, 2013.

Ilma, Hutmi Amivia. “Tantangan Mekanisme Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum Volume 5, no. 4 (2024).

Indriana, Yayan. “Pengembalian Ganti Rugi Keuangan Negara Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Cepalo 2, no. 2007 (2018): 121–28.

Koy, Yunita Inoriti. “PROSEDUR MEKANISME PENGEMBALIAN ASET NEGARA HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Teknologi Terapan AMATA 03, no. 1 (2024): 1–10.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Kharisma Putra Utama, 2005.

Mukti Fajar ND., Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2020.

Muladi, and Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2010.

Mulkan, Hasanal, and Serlika Aprita. “ASSET RECOVERY DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum “THE JURIS” VII, no. 1 (2023): 174–80.

Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum, and Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. “NASKAH AKADEMIK RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG PERAMPASAN ASET TINDAK PIDANA,” 2022.

Nations, United. “UNITED NATIONS AGAINST CORRUPTION.” Vienna, 2004.

Nikolaus Harbowo, Machradin Wahyudi Ritonga. “Masuk Prolegnas Prioritas, RUU Perampasan Aset Ditargetkan Tuntas Tahun Ini.” Kompas.Id, September 9, 2025. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/masuk-prolegnas-prioritas-ruu-perampasan-aset-ditargetkan-tuntas-tahun-ini.

Prof.Dr.Barda Nawawi Arief, S.H. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Edisi kedu. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial: Suatu Tinjauan Teoretis Serta Pengalaman-Pengalaman Di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni, 1979.

Refi Meidiantama, Cholfia Aldamia. “PENGEMBALIAN ASET PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA PADA HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA.” Muhammadiyah Law Review 15, no. 3 (2022).

RI, DPR. “Paripurna Tetapkan RUU Perampasan Aset Masuk Bersama 51 RUU Prioritas Prolegnas 2025-2026 Lainnya.” Jakarta, 2025. https://www.dpr.go.id/kegiatan-dpr/berita/Paripurna-Tetapkan-RUU-Perampasan-Aset-Masuk-Bersama-51-RUU-Prioritas-Prolegnas-2025-2026-Lainnya-59616.

Susanto, Asmara Nova, and Wiwik Afifah. “Peran Lembaga Yang Mendukung Penelusuran Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Menggunakan Cryptocurrency.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 2, no. 4 (2024): 210–16.

Tibiko Zabar, Kurnia Ramadhana, Wana Alamsyah. “Catatan Akhir Tahun Agenda Pemberantasan Korupsi 2019 Indonesia Corruption Watch.” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2019. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/catatan-akhir-tahun-agenda-pemberantasan-korupsi-2019-indonesia-corruption-watch.

“Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” 1999.

UNODC. “Asset Recovery and Management in Corruption Cases.” Vienna, 2017.

Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Rifqi Dwi Bachtiar Rifqi, Hidayatullah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

How to Cite

The Draft Asset Confiscation Law in the Recovery of State Losses. (2026). JIHK, 8(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.429