Dishonorable Removal of a Notary for Breach of Professional Ethics: An Analysis of Decision No. 3/Pdt.G/2022/PN Plk

Authors

  • Kintan Salma Waluya Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Indonesia
  • Tetti Samosir Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Indonesia
  • Jum Anggriani Universitas Pancasila, Jakarta Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.422

Keywords:

Notary, Dishonorable Dismissal, Code of Ethics, Regional Supervisory Council, Procedural Justice

Abstract

Dishonorable dismissal of a notary constitutes the most severe administrative sanction, directly affecting the continuity of office and the professional legitimacy of notaries as public officials. This study examines the legality of dishonorable dismissal imposed on a notary for ethical violations and evaluates the role of the Regional Supervisory Council within the notarial oversight system, focusing on Decision Number 3/Pdt.G/2022/PN Plk. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case-based approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and juridical reasoning. The findings reveal that although the authority to dismiss notaries is normatively regulated under the Notary Office Act, its implementation in the case under study raises significant concerns regarding legal certainty, proportionality of sanctions, and compliance with procedural justice, particularly the right to defense. Furthermore, the Regional Supervisory Council has not functioned optimally as a professional guidance mechanism and tends to operate in a predominantly procedural-administrative manner. This study underscores the need to recalibrate the notarial supervision framework to ensure that dishonorable dismissal is imposed in an accountable, proportional, and legally reasoned manner consistent with the principles of good governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Almuslimah, Alidatussadiyah, Mohammad Rynan Bakry, dan Chandra Yusuf. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pelanggaran Etika Rangkap Jabatan Notaris Oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah.” Adil Jurnal Hukum 12, no. 2 (2021): 21–54. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v12i2.2111.

Amriaty, Nurul. “Penegakan Hukum atas Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Yang Memberikan Teguran Tertulis Kepada Notaris.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 4, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p62-85.

Ardini, Shela. “Otoritas Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Mengusulkan Pemberhentian Tidak Hormat Notaris Kepada Majelis Pengawas Pusat.” Gorontalo Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 154–60. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i2.3815.

Gomies, Franky Roberto. “Notaris Dalam Status Terpidana Yang Masih Menjalankan Jabatannya.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Argumentum 7, no. 1 (2020): 16–26. https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v7i1.3009.

Jufri, Muhammad, Muhammad Sabaruddin Sinapoy, La Sensu, Guasman Tatawu, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, dan A. Wahyudin Said. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hukum atas Sanksi Administratif Pemberhentian Notaris oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris Sulawesi Tenggara.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 6, no. 1 (2024): 92–102. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v6i1.667.

Nabila, Marcelina Siti, dan Pieter E. Latumeten. “Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Terhadap Jabatannya (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara No. 235/G/2019/PTUN.KT).” Unes Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 5274–82. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1354.

Putra, Guntur Ilman, Siti Hasanah, dan Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara. “Penguatan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris dalam Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris.” Journal of Community Engagement 4, no. 2 (2023): 679–88. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2023475.

Safira, Annisa. “Kepatuhan Terhadap Kode Etik Sebagai Parameter Notaris untuk Mencegah Terjadinya Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 5, no. 3 (2025): 1738–47. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.3625.

Salsabilla, Lolita, Dhimas Nur M. Ruata, dan Krens Saesar Tauhid Akbar. “Akibat Hukum Pemberhentian Tidak Hormat Kepada Notaris Terhadap Akta-Akta yang Telah Dibuatnya.” Unes Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 208–19. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2242.

Sihite, Chaterine Felicia. “Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris yang Dijatuhi Sanksi Administratif Oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris.” Jurnal Notarius 2, no. 1 (2023): 54–64. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/15892.

Silalahi, Agnes Tori Yolanda, dan Pieter Everhardus Latuementen. “Implementasi Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Terkait dengan Pelaksanaan Jabatanny Terhadap Akta-Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” JIHHP: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 5, no. 3 (2025): 1655–63. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.3623.

Wibowo, Wahyu Satya, Johni Najwan, dan Firdaus Abu Bakar. “Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.” Recital Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 323–52. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861.

Books

Salim, Salim HS. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Diedit oleh Tarmizi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Edisi Revisi). Diedit oleh Ahsan Yunus. Cetakan 5. Yogyakarta: Mitra Buana Media, 2022.

Larasati, Rindiana. Dinamika Sistem Pengawasan Notaris di Indonesia. Diedit oleh Bunga Desyana Pratami. Pekalongan: Penerbit NEM, 2023.

Suprayitno, dan Tony. Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia Pengangkatan, Pelaksanaan Jabatan, Kewenangan, Larangan, Pengawasan, Pembinaan dan Perlindungan Terhadap Notaris. Diedit oleh Mujib Medio Annas dan Kukuh Derajat. Medan: Merdeka Kreasi Group, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-05

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Kintan Salma Waluya, Tetti Samosir, Jum Anggriani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

How to Cite

Dishonorable Removal of a Notary for Breach of Professional Ethics: An Analysis of Decision No. 3/Pdt.G/2022/PN Plk. (2026). JIHK, 7(2), 1518-1529. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.422