Repositioning Gratification as an Ordinary Criminal Offense in Indonesia’s Criminal Law System: a Conceptual Analysis and Directions for Legal Reform

Authors

  • Alendra Alendra Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
  • Agus Irawan Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
  • Iin Pebrianto Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
  • Hendra Bustari Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi
  • Salman Adrian Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.393

Keywords:

Corruption Offenses,, Criminal Law,, Criminal Offenses,, Ordinary Criminal Offenses

Abstract

Gratification under the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law (Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi) is classified as a special criminal offense characterized by a repressive approach, a broad legal definition, and the application of a reverse burden of proof. This regulatory framework raises normative concerns following the enactment of the 2023 National Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana), which emphasizes the principles of legality, culpability, and proportionality in sentencing. This study aims to examine the legal construction of gratification, identify regulatory disharmony between the Anti-Corruption Law and the National Criminal Code, and assess the urgency of reformulating the legal status of gratification within the Indonesian criminal law system. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds a paradigmatic divergence and a heightened risk of overcriminalization resulting from the absence of a clearly defined mens rea element. The study concludes that reclassifying gratification as an ordinary criminal offense with differentiated sanctions is necessary to achieve a just, consistent, and effective criminal justice system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Angkasa, Nitaria, Tirta Gautama, and Ridwan Ridwan. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Justice Law: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2022): 20–33. https://scholar.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/2554.

Athallah, Arraeya Arrineki, K N Sofyan Hasan, and Henny Yuningsih. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Di Indonesia.” Lex Lata: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v6i1.2854.

Bego, Karolus Charlaes, Johari Johari, Yudi Krismen, Zulkarnain Zulkarnain, and Muchamad Taufiq. “Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Dalam Jabatan Publik: Studi Perbandingan Antara KUHP Dan UU Tipikor.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 8, no. 8 (2025): 5074–81. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i8.8429.

Bethesda, Elisabeth. “Masyarakat Memandang Gratifikasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2019): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.18311.

Bustomi, Bustomi. “Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Oleh Pejabat Negara.” Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2024): 284–292. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i1.798.

Daeng M, Mohamad Yusuf, Dedi Andriyan, and Hafidz Syukri Hamdani. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Bentuk Gratifikasi.” Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research 3, no. 2 (2023): 2946–2959. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/660.

Dhumillah, Dewic Sri Ratnaning, and Setya Budi Dias Oktavianto. “Konsep Relevansi Kejahatan Trading Influence Dan Gratifikasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Iblam Law Review 5, no. 1 (2025): 7–14. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i1.526.

Iskandar, Irvan Sebastian. “Konsepsi Gratifikasi Sebagai Korupsi Bagi Pejabat Publik.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik 14, no. 2 (2023): 101–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jap.v14i2.21863%0A.

Maradona, Tigana Barkah. “Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Budaya Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 9, no. 1 (2021): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v9i1.52526.

Nasution, Ingka Harsani. “Sistem Pelaporan Gratifikasi Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi 2, no. 8 (2021): 1356–1375. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v2i08.219.

Sitompul, Ariman. “Gratification Development in Corruption in Indonesia.” International Asia of Law and Money Laundering 3, no. 1 (2024): 17–22. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77.

Yulia, Yulia Monita, Andi Najemi, and Nys Arfa. “Urgensi Pengaturan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Gratifikasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora 7, no. 1 (2023): 40–57. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v7i1.21931.

Books

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016. https://prenadamedia.com/produk/bunga-rampai-kebijakan-hukum-pidana/.

Atmasasmita, Romli. Reformasi Hukum, Hak Asasi Manusia & Penegakan Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2001.

Hamzah, Andi. Asas - Asas Hukum Pidana. 1st ed. Jakarta: PT Yarsif Watampone, 2005.

Handayani, Asri Reni. “Indikator Keberhasilan Pemberantasan Korupsi.” In Pengetahuan Dasar Antikorupsi Dan Integritas, edited by Zeni Zaenal Mutaqin, 39–57. Bandung: CV Media Sains Indonesia, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

How to Cite

Repositioning Gratification as an Ordinary Criminal Offense in Indonesia’s Criminal Law System: a Conceptual Analysis and Directions for Legal Reform. (2026). JIHK, 8(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v8i1.393