Potential Monopoly Issues in the Grab–GOTO Merger Plan: An Analysis Under Indonesian Competition Law

Authors

  • Cathleen Lie Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Gunardi Lie Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.378

Keywords:

Merger, Monopoly, Digital Platform, Competition Law

Abstract

This study examines the potential monopolistic effects arising from the planned merger between Grab and Gojek, two dominant digital transportation platforms in Indonesia. As multi-sided markets characterized by strong network effects, ride-hailing platforms naturally tend toward high market concentration. The merger is projected to create a combined market share exceeding 90% and elevate the market's Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) far above conventional antitrust thresholds. Using a normative legal method supported by statutory analysis and the economic analysis of law, this research evaluates whether such a merger may violate Indonesia’s Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning anti-monopoly and unfair business competition, particularly regarding monopoly formation, dominant position, and anti-competitive mergers. The results indicate that the merger carries a high risk of creating a monopoly structure, increasing entry barriers, reducing consumer welfare, weakening drivers’ bargaining power, and enabling potential abuse of dominance. It is recommended that the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) impose strong structural remedies or prohibit the merger entirely to preserve healthy competition in the digital platform industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Ainurrafik, Fakhira Kamila, Latifa Dwi Apriliana, Raihana Manila Azzahra, dan Annisa Febrianti. “Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Dampak Merger Perusahaan Gojek dan Tokopedia.” Adil Jurnal Hukum 15, no. 2 (2024): 255–71. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v15i2.3591.

Astarina, Nuresti Tristya. “Analisis Merger Perusahaan Digital Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus: Merger Goto dan Douyo/Huya).” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, no. 1 (2023): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i1.11233.

Ate, Yordanius Trio, Kanisius Nggala, Agnes Vivi Susanti, dan Matilda Evarista E. Goma. “Aspek Hukum dan Regulasi dalam Penggabungan Usaha (Merger dan Akuisisi).” JCS-Journal of Comprehensive Science 4, no. 1 (2025): 385–92. https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v4i1.2985.

Juangga, Ega, dan Dwi Astuti. “Evaluasi Strategi Aliansi Bisnis Gojek dan Tokopedia dari Perspektif Manajemen Strategik.” Journal of Business Economics and Management 1, no. 4 (2025): 1038–42. https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jbem/article/view/428.

Nurseptianingsih, Dea, Estri Nuraini Hidami, Giska Tri Wida Mulyani, Naerul Edwin Kiky Aprianto, dan Yuda Restu Prasetya. “Dampak Integrasi, Merger dan Konglomerasi Terhadap Risio Persaingan dan Stabilitas Perekonomian.” Jurnal Akademik Ekonomi dan Manajemen 1, no. 4 (2024): 152–61. https://doi.org/10.61722/jaem.v1i4.3296.

Pranadita, Nugraha, Naufal Hamdan, dan Andre Kris Purwandani. “Pengaruh Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terhadap Strategi Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Dalam Rangka Memenangkan Persaingan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi 5, no. 3 (2021): 1849–67. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i3.1643.

Pratama, M. Andika Yuda. “Akuisisi dan Konsolidasi Startup di Indonesia: Telaah Literatur atas Dampaknya terhadap Persaingan Usaha dan Inovasi.” Hasina: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Syariah 2, no. 2 (2025): 138–50. https://doi.org/10.35897/hasina.v2i2.2024.

Ramadhani, Husna Maulidah, Elisatris Gultom, dan Sudaryat. “Penggunaan Produk Goto Group dalam Rangkaian Operasi Marketplace Tokopedia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” Jurnal Reformasi Hukum 26, no. 2 (2022): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v26i2.459.

Setiawan, Ahmad Budi. “Revolusi Bisnis Berbasis Platform Sebagai Penggerak Ekonomi Digital di Indonesia.” Masyarakat Telematika dan Informasi Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi 9, no. 1 (2018): 61–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17933/mti.v9i1.118.

Situmorang, Komala Febriani. “Analisis Perbandingan Competitive Advantage, Kualitas Layanan dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi Pada Gojek dan Grab.” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi 8, no. 2 (2024): 1676–95. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v8i2.4205.

Books

Aghivirwiati, Gusti Ayu, Thomas Soseco, Hadi Sutrisno, Telly Zuvilla Irwanto, Dian Mardiati Sari, Chrestiana Aponno, Agustinus Fangohoy, Desi Ade Trya, Heppy Syofya, dan Lies Hendrawan. Ekonomi Digital dan Perubahan Struktur Pasar. Diedit oleh Windy Gustiawan. Batam: Yayasan Cendikia Mulia Mandiri, 2025.

Jaya, Wihana Kirana. Ekonomi Industri. Yogyakarta: UGM Press, 2023.

Fathurrahamn, Izzan. “Melestarikan Pekerja Rentan di Balik Ekonomi Inovasi: Praktik Kerja Perusahaan Teknologi kepada Mitra Pengemudi Ojek Online di Indonesia.” In Menyoal Kerja Layak dan Adil Dalam Ekonomi GIG di Indonesia, diedit oleh Yeremias T. Keban, Ari Hernawan, dan Arif Novianto. Yogyakarta: IGPA Press, 2021.

Mala, Iva Khoiril, Andry Stephannie Titing, dan Ihsan Fajri. Strategi Pemasaran Digital di Era Disrupsi Teknologi. Diedit oleh Nur Afifah. Padang: Takaza Innovatix Labs, 2025.

Nababan, Benny Osta, Yesi Dewita Sari, Mujito, Wawan Hari Subagyo, dan Muhlis. Manajemen Pelayanan Publik dan Bisnis. Diedit oleh Benny Osta Nababan. Yogyakarta: Selat Media Patners, 2023.

Nasution, Zulkarnai. Ekonomi Mikro di Era Disrupsi: Teori dan Aplikasinya dalam Ekonomi Digital. Bandung: Grafindo Publisher, 2025.

Sembiring, Helena Ras Ulina, dan Ima Rohimah. Daya Saing Indonesia di Era Globalisasi. Malang: Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing), 2021.

Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

Potential Monopoly Issues in the Grab–GOTO Merger Plan: An Analysis Under Indonesian Competition Law. (2025). JIHK, 7(2), 1138-1149. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.378