A Juridical Analysis of the Validity of General Meeting of Shareholders’ Resolutions in Cases of Procedural and Organizational Deviations

Authors

  • Caesar Andre Kuistono Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Richard C. Adam Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.375

Keywords:

General Meeting of Shareholders, Limited Liability Company, Attendance Quorum, Validity of Resolutions

Abstract

The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), as the highest governing body of a Limited Liability Company, must be conducted in accordance with the formal and material procedures mandated by Law Number 40 of 2007 to ensure that its resolutions carry binding legal effect. This study employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach to examine the validity of GMS resolutions in instances of procedural deviation, including improper notice, omission of the meeting agenda, or failure to satisfy attendance and decision-making quorum requirements. The findings show that such procedural violations generally render GMS resolutions invalid and may provide grounds for shareholders to file a claim before the district court under Article 61 of the Company Law, except in situations where all shareholders are present and unanimously approve the resolutions as permitted under Article 82(5). Beyond invalidating resolutions, procedural deviations may also give rise to civil liability for directors or commissioners, underscoring the importance of adherence to GMS procedures in safeguarding shareholder rights and supporting sound corporate governance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Arifin, Abiyyu Paras Syakir, dan Sodikin. “Penerapan Prinsip Fiduciary Duty Untuk Mewujudkan Good Corporate Governance Dalam Perseroan Terbatas.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 2, no. 2 (2025): 173–84. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.3583.

Chandra, Fernando, Erniyanti, Fadlan, dan Soerya Respationo. “Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Secara Online Untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum (Studi Penelitian PT Midi Utama Indonesia Tbk (Midi)).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 3852–63. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.

Damanik, Wiwin Ayu Wulandari, Sunarmi, dan Robert. “Keabsahan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Dalam Peralihan Saham Yang Berasal Dari Objek PPJB Yang Belum Lunas: Studi Putusan Nomor 29/PDT.SUS.GLL/2022/PN NIAGA.JKT.PST.” Sibatik Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan 4, no. 8 (2025): 1933–51. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v4i8.2959.

Hadid, Hamasah Ramadhani, Anriz Nazaruddin Halim, dan Amelia Nur Widyanti. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Berita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham yang Tidak Memenuhi Kuorum Kehadiran.” Journal of Innovation Research And Knowledge 4, no. 11 (2025): 8397–8408. https://doi.org/10.53625/jirk.v4i11.10057.

Hariansah, Syafri. “Analisis Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Budaya Hukum dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara: Studi Kritis Pendekatan Masyarakat, Budaya dan Hukum.” Krtha Bhayangkara 16, no. 1 (2022): 121–30. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1194.

Ilmiah, Ane Nor Cahya, dan Sumriyah. “Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Saham Atas Ditolaknya Gugatan Perseroan Kepada Pengadilan Negeri.” Hakim Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2023): 345–56. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v2i1.1587.

Martinelli, Imelda, Keira Adzra Athayya, Nada Vadia, dan Fitri Apriliani. “Pemaknaan Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama Usaha Dan Relevansinya Dengan Teori Norma Hans Kelsen (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6718 K/PDT/2024.” NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 12, no. 5 (2025): 2073–83. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v12i5.2025.2073-2083.

Matheus, Juan. “E-Arbitration: Digitization Of Business Dispute Resolution Pada Sektor E-Commerce Dalam Menyongsong Era Industri 4.0 Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19.” Lex Renaissance 6, no. 4 (2021): 692–704.

Mukharom, Dhian Indah Astantati, dan Dewi Tuti Muryati. “Analisis Normatif Terhadap Putusan Praperadilan No. 04/PID.PRAP/2015/PN. Berdasarkan Perspektif Kemanfaatan, Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan.” Diktum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2020): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.24905/diktum.v8i1.89.

Munthe, Sthepanie Irmina Rouli Marini, dan Arman Nefi. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa yang Diduga Dibuat Secara Melawan Hukum (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 484/pdt/2020/PT.BDG).” Indonesian Notary 4, no. 1 (2022): 490–513. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol4/iss1/23.

Notarian, Muhammad Rifky, dan Rumainur. “Tinjauan Yuridis Ketidakhadiran Pemegang Saham (Kuorum) Dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS).” Gorontalo Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 324–32. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i2.2778.

Putri, Inzafani Rahman, Dhody A. R. Widjaatmaja, dan Putra Hutomo. “Kepastian Hukum Keputusan Pemegang Saham Dengan Metode Circular Resolution Dalam Penggantian Direksi Perseroan Terbatas.” Jurnal Multidisplin Indonesia 2, no. 9 (2023): 2972–3002. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i9.574.

Saputri, Intan. “Penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Tanpa Pemanggilan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 220/Pid/2020/PT.DKI).” Indonesian Notary 15, no. 2 (2021): 355–71. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol4/iss1/17.

Sheerleen, dan Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu. “Mengurai Kepastian Hukum: Deadlock dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pemegang Saham Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Dengan Kepemilikan Berimbang.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 9, no. 4 (2024): 2304–22. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i4.14940.

Wibisono, Okky Maharani. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keputusan Circular Resolution Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Dalam Pemberhentian Direksi.” Perspektif 23, no. 3 (2018): 133–41. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v23i3.640.

Books

Sudaryat. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia: Pendirian, Tata Kelola, dan Pembubaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2025.

Regulations

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Caesar Andre Kuistono, Richard C. Adam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

How to Cite

A Juridical Analysis of the Validity of General Meeting of Shareholders’ Resolutions in Cases of Procedural and Organizational Deviations. (2025). JIHK, 7(2), 1127-1137. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i2.375

Most read articles by the same author(s)