Progressive Legal Approaches and the Prosecutorial Challenges in Executing the Indosurya Case

Authors

  • Dennis Fer Sikotti Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i1.305

Keywords:

Asset Recovery, Prosecutor, Execution of Verdicts, Progressive Law

Abstract

Asset recovery for victims in money laundering cases (Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang/TPPU) poses a significant challenge within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly in complex cases such as the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative (KSP Indosurya). This study aims to evaluate the technical, legal, and institutional barriers encountered by executing prosecutors in implementing court decisions intended to restore victims’ financial losses. The research employs a normative legal approach, incorporating case studies and analyses of statutory regulations, judicial decisions, and execution documents. The findings reveal key obstacles, including discrepancies between court rulings and the factual conditions of the seized assets, the absence of explicit language such as “confiscated for the state” in verdicts, and weak inter-agency coordination. The study concludes that procedural reform and the adoption of a progressive legal approach are essential to ensure the effective enforcement of victim restitution. It recommends cross-sectoral synchronization and the reinforcement of the legal framework for asset execution as critical steps toward achieving substantive justice in money laundering cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Journals

Agestina, Elita. “The Effectiveness of Law Changes as Progressive Law Implementation on Law Enforcement by Prioritizing Islamic Law as a Benchmark.” Ratio Legis Journal 1, no. 4 (2022): 464–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.1.4.%25p.

Andreanto, Andreanto, Muhammad Arief Amrullah, and Fanny Tanuwijaya. “Pemulihan Aset Korban Penipuan Sebagai Tindak Pidana Asal Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat 9, no. 2 (2023): 228–37. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i2.262.

Apriliansah, Lalu, and Hudi Yusuf. “Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi: Studi Pada Kasus Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara 1, no. 6 (2024): 9922–37. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jicn/article/view/1869.

Fadilah, Nurul. “Implementation of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency in Providing Protection to Victims of Vigilantes (Eigenrichting).” Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology 1, no. 1 (2023): 85–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/sajv.v1i1.24685.

Gunawan, Cepy Indra. “Perampasan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Rangka Pengembalian Aset Negara.” Hangoluan Law Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 106–37. https://hlr.unja.ac.id/index.php/hlr/article/view/6.

Irwan, Tania. “Implementasi Upaya Pemulihan Aset Korban Kejahatan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Pencucian Uang Dalam Kasus First Travel.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 5, no. 4 (2021): 698–719. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i4.2223.

Joshua, Mishael, and Rahaditya Rahaditya. “Quo Vadis Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Sebagai Pemenuhan Keadilan Terhadap Korban.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 10089–98. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1880.

Lengkong, Lonna Yohanes. “Urgensi Penerapan Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat 9, no. 3 (2023): 351–64. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i3.278.

Pandiangan, Florensia, and Berlian Simarmata. “Pemulihan Aset Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Berasal Dari Penipuan: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 365 PK/Pid.Sus/2022.” Jurnal Profil Hukum 3, no. 1 (2025): 24–37. https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/JPH/article/view/4572.

Prabowo, Sukma, Siswantari Pratiwi, and Mardani Mardani. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dan Pencucian Uang: Studi Putusan Nomor 83/Pid.B/2018/PN.DPK.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli 7, no. 1 (2024): 356–69. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v7i1.2386.

Saputra, Trias, and Yudha Adi Nugraha. “Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi: Upaya Pemulihan Korban Tindak Pidana.” Krtha Bhayangkara 16, no. 1 (2022): 65–80. http://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/KRTHA.

Subihat, Ihat. “Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Yustitia 4, no. 1 (2018): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.31943/yustitia.v4i1.31.

Sulaksono, Satriawan, Widodo Tresno Novianto, and Supanto Supanto. “Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Pemulihan Aset Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Tercampur Dengan Aset Pelaku.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 7, no. 1 (2019): 107–19. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29202.

Books

Chandra, Alex, Vience Ratna Multi Wijaya, and Esti Royani. Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Hakim Berupa Pidana Tambahan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sleman: Zahir Publishing, 2023. https://zahirpublishing.net/detail-kekuatan-eksekutorial-putusan-hakim-berupa-pidana-tambahan-dalam-perkara-tindak-pidana-korupsi-421.

Hiariej, Eddy Oemar Syarief. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2017.

Zedner, Lucia, and Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg. “Due Process.” In Core Concepts in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, edited by Kai Ambos, Antony Duff, Julian Roberts, Thomas Weigend, and Alexander Heinze, 304–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649742.009.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-20

How to Cite

Sikotti, D. F. . (2025). Progressive Legal Approaches and the Prosecutorial Challenges in Executing the Indosurya Case. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren, 7(1), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v7i1.305