Creating Legal Certainty for Victims A Comparative Analysis of the Resolution of Past Gross Human Rights Violations Through Judicial and Non-Judicial Mechanisms
Main Article Content
Abstract
Disputes in import-export businesses pose substantial challenges to the dynamics of global trade. This study examines the critical factors influencing dispute resolution methods, focusing on a comparative analysis of litigation and arbitration in the context of international trade. Employing a normative legal research methodology with a comparative approach, the study evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Key factors considered include the complexity of disputes, monetary value, confidentiality needs, the dynamics of the parties involved, and the potential impact on business relationships. The findings indicate that arbitration often provides a more flexible, efficient, and relationship-preserving solution than traditional litigation, though the optimal approach depends on the specific characteristics of each case. This study offers strategic insights for businesses navigating international trade disputes, underscoring the importance of adopting a tailored and measurable dispute resolution strategy.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
Journals
Afdhali, Dino Rizka, and Taufiqurrohman Syahuri. “Idealitas Penegakkan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Tujuan Hukum.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 6, no. 2 (2023): 555–61. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i2.1078.
Ali, Mohammad, and Mohammad Abdul Rauf. “Problem Yuridis Penyelesaian Perkara HAM Berat Dalam Sistem Pidana Indonesia Dan Pidana Islam.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 24, no. 2 (2021): 469–94. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.2.469-494.
Alvin Hamidah, Nadia, Aris Prio Agus Santoso, Dewa Sakti, Evrilia Sifaul, Helmi Nugraheni, Maya Mukti, Amanda Sukma, et al. “Penegakan HAM Di Era Modernisasi.” Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no. 6 (2023): 459–63. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i6.406.
Hakim, Lukman, and Nalom Kurniawan. “Membangun Paradigma Hukum HAM Indonesia Berbasis Kewajiban Asasi Manusia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 4 (2022): 869–97. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1847.
Hambali, Ahmad. “Kebijakan Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat Ham Masa Lalu Oleh Pemerintahan Jokowi.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 6, no. 1 (2023): 46–57. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i1.810.
Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Crepido: Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum: Filsafat Dan Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22 .
Kurniawan, Ardian, Rafikah Rafikah, and Nuraida Fitrihabi. “Kepastian Hukum, Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan Pemidanaan Kejahatan Asal Usul Perkawinan: Analisis Putusan No. 387/Pid.B/2021/PN.Jmb.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 7, no. 2 (2021): 485–509. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2022.8.1.1-13.
Leawoods, Heather. “Gustav Radbruch: An Extraordinary Legal Philosopher.” Journal of Law and Policy 2 (2000): 489–515. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol2/iss1/16.
Marzuki, Ismail, and Faridy Faridy. “Relevansi Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Dengan Agenda Reformasi: Dimensi Nasional Dan Internasional.” Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 5, no. 2 (2020): 350–59. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.242.
Purnama Santhi, Ni Nyoman Putri, and Fanny Priscyllia. “Aspek Yuridis Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat Masa Lalu Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains 3, no. 2 (2024): 255–63. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v3i02.1249.
Rahmadhani, Alifiyah Fitrah, and Dodi Jaya Wardana. “Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat Di Indonesia.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 2799–2807. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1056.
Wahyuningroem, Sri Lestari. “Towards Post-Transitional Justice: The Failures of Transitional Justice and the Roles of Civil Society in Indonesia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 3, no. 1 (2019): 124–54. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v3i1.11497.
Wajdi, Farid, and Imran Imran. “Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Korban.” Jurnal Yudisial 14, no. 2 (2022): 229–246. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v14i2.445.
Zunnuraeni, Zunnuraeni, Zaenal Asikin, and Kurniawan Kurniawan. “Hak-Hak Atas Lingkungan Dalam Hukum Nasional Indonesia.” Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2022): 238–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v3i2.69.
Books
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. New York: Everyman Paperbacks, 1993.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya, 2010.
Otto, Jan Michiel. Kepastian Hukum Di Negara Berkembang. Translated by Tristan Moeliono. Jakarta: Komisi Hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia, 2003.